Mageia 2019-0297: libpcap and tcpdump security update

    Date16 Oct 2019
    1304
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated libpcap and tcpdump packages fix security vulnerabilities: The libpcap packages have been updated to versions 1.9.1 and tcpdump to 4.9.3, respectively, fixing several buffer overread and overflow issues.
    MGASA-2019-0297 - Updated libpcap and tcpdump packages fix security vulnerabilities
    
    Publication date: 16 Oct 2019
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2019-0297.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 7
    CVE: CVE-2017-16808,
         CVE-2018-10103,
         CVE-2018-10105,
         CVE-2018-14461,
         CVE-2018-14462,
         CVE-2018-14463,
         CVE-2018-14464,
         CVE-2018-14465,
         CVE-2018-14466,
         CVE-2018-14467,
         CVE-2018-14468,
         CVE-2018-14469,
         CVE-2018-14470,
         CVE-2018-14879,
         CVE-2018-14880,
         CVE-2018-14881,
         CVE-2018-14882,
         CVE-2018-16227,
         CVE-2018-16228,
         CVE-2018-16229,
         CVE-2018-16230,
         CVE-2018-16300,
         CVE-2018-16301,
         CVE-2018-16451,
         CVE-2018-16452,
         CVE-2019-15161,
         CVE-2019-15162,
         CVE-2019-15163,
         CVE-2019-15164,
         CVE-2019-15165,
         CVE-2019-15166,
         CVE-2019-15167
    
    Updated libpcap and tcpdump packages fix security vulnerabilities:
    
    The libpcap packages have been updated to versions 1.9.1 and tcpdump
    to 4.9.3, respectively, fixing several buffer overread and overflow
    issues.
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25565
    - https://www.tcpdump.org/libpcap-changes.txt
    - https://www.tcpdump.org/tcpdump-changes.txt
    - https://www.tcpdump.org/public-cve-list.txt
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-16808
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-10103
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-10105
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14461
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14462
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14463
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14464
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14465
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14466
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14467
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14468
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14469
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14470
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14879
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14880
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14881
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-14882
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16227
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16228
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16229
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16230
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16300
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16301
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16451
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16452
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15161
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15162
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15163
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15164
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15165
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15166
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-15167
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/libpcap-1.9.1-1.mga7
    - 7/core/tcpdump-4.9.3-1.mga7
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/25-what-do-you-think-of-the-linuxsecurity-privacy-news-articles?task=poll.vote&format=json
    25
    radio
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"31","type":"x","order":"1","pct":91.18,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":5.88,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":2.94,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.