openSUSE: 2020:0051-1: important: log4j

    Date14 Jan 2020
    CategoryopenSUSE
    56
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
       openSUSE Security Update: Security update for log4j
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    openSUSE-SU-2020:0051-1
    Rating:             important
    References:         #1159646 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-17571
    Affected Products:
                        openSUSE Leap 15.1
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for log4j fixes the following issues:
    
       - CVE-2019-17571: Fixed a remote code execution by deserialization of
         untrusted data in SocketServer (bsc#1159646).
    
       This update was imported from the SUSE:SLE-15:Update update project.
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this openSUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1:
    
          zypper in -t patch openSUSE-2020-51=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1 (noarch):
    
          log4j-1.2.17-lp151.5.3.1
          log4j-javadoc-1.2.17-lp151.5.3.1
          log4j-manual-1.2.17-lp151.5.3.1
          log4j-mini-1.2.17-lp151.5.3.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-17571.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1159646
    
    -- 
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"81","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.25,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"21","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.58,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.17,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.