RedHat: RHSA-2020-1289:01 Critical: haproxy security update

    Date02 Apr 2020
    437
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update for haproxy is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Critical. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    =====================================================================
                       Red Hat Security Advisory
    
    Synopsis:          Critical: haproxy security update
    Advisory ID:       RHSA-2020:1289-01
    Product:           Red Hat Enterprise Linux
    Advisory URL:      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1289
    Issue date:        2020-04-02
    CVE Names:         CVE-2020-11100 
    =====================================================================
    
    1. Summary:
    
    An update for haproxy is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0
    Update Services for SAP Solutions.
    
    Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact
    of Critical. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which
    gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from
    the CVE link(s) in the References section.
    
    2. Relevant releases/architectures:
    
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v. 8.0) - aarch64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64
    
    3. Description:
    
    The haproxy packages provide a reliable, high-performance network load
    balancer for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * haproxy: malformed HTTP/2 requests can lead to out-of-bounds writes
    (CVE-2020-11100)
    
    For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS
    score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE
    page(s) listed in the References section.
    
    4. Solution:
    
    For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes
    described in this advisory, refer to:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    
    5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/):
    
    1819111 - CVE-2020-11100 haproxy: malformed HTTP/2 requests can lead to out-of-bounds writes
    
    6. Package List:
    
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v. 8.0):
    
    Source:
    haproxy-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.src.rpm
    
    aarch64:
    haproxy-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.aarch64.rpm
    haproxy-debuginfo-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.aarch64.rpm
    haproxy-debugsource-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.aarch64.rpm
    
    ppc64le:
    haproxy-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.ppc64le.rpm
    haproxy-debuginfo-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.ppc64le.rpm
    haproxy-debugsource-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.ppc64le.rpm
    
    s390x:
    haproxy-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.s390x.rpm
    haproxy-debuginfo-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.s390x.rpm
    haproxy-debugsource-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.s390x.rpm
    
    x86_64:
    haproxy-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.x86_64.rpm
    haproxy-debuginfo-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.x86_64.rpm
    haproxy-debugsource-1.8.15-5.el8_0.1.x86_64.rpm
    
    These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security.  Our key and
    details on how to verify the signature are available from
    https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/
    
    7. References:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-11100
    https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#critical
    https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/haproxy
    
    8. Contact:
    
    The Red Hat security contact is . More contact
    details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/
    
    Copyright 2020 Red Hat, Inc.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1
    
    iQIVAwUBXoXretzjgjWX9erEAQjarhAAjLBhVdWAhKquYM+xOuWX1F8yCuCmlCD5
    VIfcrFKH4450Nd2tAlyaTsF3974TXz9GpEt/vIGoix3H/81h1Khf0jrwepUSSEX1
    XNb1C0NtxK57YfNCU2ZogLWwOhPgj0hSH+ZB9wGEKbnz2XuaOhNy7lRcxhOG+ucT
    aBYT7AlE4zNUx2DHuBMb/JoytdGPrknt42W6r6K5K2uNdzdPUEXhmTYCzhLqmCz1
    +Rs9O3ZAgnMfQO83G3LPoJna4Lzfju8l6+C+I84kgCVOJMi6uKobACavldHLBRML
    UQsdYXZpvt2MCjMHaugV5jfoWTbu4ocBjelzH7Pm8H/ejy8nt2NjeRb03WmVylAR
    NH6Cd0YP0G6gQeZi3Ve9Z7kpjzIMyH+poSOj2xFrb0cog99q/qYFdoDgAkp6tdj9
    YS6N/aaHV0fSQiyu9DZR5fX0/6lMq6ySUQuGT1Y8HUPIaeATu2UfNs2J1Vg8Pqv1
    Awnl9N5pIEBPt154GDGS1Y1u8pazGcdMgIXFRyp/BSPw1IDNZS9BDzf8Ej1baCE0
    24dCg3nZPwr9ibMBaMR7KAuFPhNJeG3TxcRCxqXS1zFc7hywKlWmIJONcSPGvVnX
    7IzQvn4RMjR8AmBVyZ6gjT1vy26P6T+qlT5txwQmmXjx+e75lNmxVcarHghy9Yc/
    uKGKxQcZpDE=
    =cSWB
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    --
    RHSA-announce mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/25-what-do-you-think-of-the-linuxsecurity-privacy-news-articles?task=poll.vote&format=json
    25
    radio
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"90","type":"x","order":"1","pct":78.95,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"18","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.79,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"3","pct":5.26,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.