SUSE: 2019:3127-1 moderate: python-Django

    Date29 Nov 2019
    CategorySuSE
    68
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes two vulnerabilities is now available.
    
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for python-Django
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:3127-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1120932 #1139945 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-12781 CVE-2019-3498
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Enterprise Storage 5
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes two vulnerabilities is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for python-Django fixes the following issues:
    
       - CVE-2019-12781: Added incorrect HTTP detection with reverse-proxy
         connecting via HTTPS (bsc#1139945).
       - CVE-2019-3498: Fixed a content spoofing via crafted URL in the default
         404 page (bsc#1120932).
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - SUSE Enterprise Storage 5:
    
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-Storage-5-2019-3127=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - SUSE Enterprise Storage 5 (noarch):
    
          python-Django-1.6.11-6.10.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-12781.html
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-3498.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1120932
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1139945
    
    _______________________________________________
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-security-updates
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.