SUSE: 2019:14235-1 important: tightvnc

    Date 29 Nov 2019
    370
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes four vulnerabilities is now available.
    
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for tightvnc
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:14235-1
    Rating:             important
    References:         #1155442 #1155452 #1155472 #1155476 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-15678 CVE-2019-15679 CVE-2019-15680
                        CVE-2019-8287
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11-SP4-LTSS
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11-SP3
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP3
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes four vulnerabilities is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for tightvnc fixes the following issues:
    
       - CVE-2019-15679: Fixed a heap buffer overflow in InitialiseRFBConnection
         which might lead to code execution (bsc#1155476).
       - CVE-2019-8287: Fixed a global buffer overflow in HandleCoRREBBPmay which
         might lead to code execution (bsc#1155472).
       - CVE-2019-15680: Fixed a null pointer dereference in HandleZlibBPP which
         could have led to denial of service (bsc#1155452).
       - CVE-2019-15678: Fixed a heap buffer overflow in rfbServerCutText handler
         (bsc#1155442).
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11-SP4-LTSS:
    
          zypper in -t patch slessp4-tightvnc-14235=1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11-SP3:
    
          zypper in -t patch sleposp3-tightvnc-14235=1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4:
    
          zypper in -t patch dbgsp4-tightvnc-14235=1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP3:
    
          zypper in -t patch dbgsp3-tightvnc-14235=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11-SP4-LTSS (i586 ppc64 s390x x86_64):
    
          tightvnc-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11-SP3 (i586):
    
          tightvnc-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4 (i586 ppc64 s390x x86_64):
    
          tightvnc-debuginfo-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
          tightvnc-debugsource-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP3 (i586 s390x x86_64):
    
          tightvnc-debuginfo-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
          tightvnc-debugsource-1.3.9-81.15.3.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-15678.html
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-15679.html
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-15680.html
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8287.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1155442
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1155452
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1155472
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1155476
    
    _______________________________________________
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-security-updates
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.