Ubuntu 4206-1: GraphicsMagick vulnerabilities

    Date 03 Dec 2019
    210
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues were fixed in GraphicsMagick.
    ==========================================================================
    Ubuntu Security Notice USN-4206-1
    December 02, 2019
    
    graphicsmagick vulnerabilities
    ==========================================================================
    
    A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:
    
    - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    
    Summary:
    
    Several security issues were fixed in GraphicsMagick.
    
    Software Description:
    - graphicsmagick: collection of image processing tools
    
    Details:
    
    It was discovered that GraphicsMagick incorrectly handled certain image files.
    An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service.
    (CVE-2017-10794, CVE-2017-10799, CVE-2017-11102, CVE-2017-11140,
    CVE-2017-11403, CVE-2017-11636, CVE-2017-11637, CVE-2017-13147, CVE-2017-14042,
    CVE-2017-6335)
    
    Update instructions:
    
    The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following
    package versions:
    
    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
      graphicsmagick                  1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
      libgraphicsmagick++-q16-12      1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
      libgraphicsmagick-q16-3         1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
    
    In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
    
    References:
      https://usn.ubuntu.com/4206-1
      CVE-2017-10794, CVE-2017-10799, CVE-2017-11102, CVE-2017-11140,
      CVE-2017-11403, CVE-2017-11636, CVE-2017-11637, CVE-2017-13147,
      CVE-2017-14042, CVE-2017-6335
    
    Package Information:
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphicsmagick/1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    If you are using full-disk encryption: are you concerned about the resulting performance hit?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/34-if-you-are-using-full-disk-encryption-are-you-concerned-about-the-resulting-performance-hit?task=poll.vote&format=json
    34
    radio
    [{"id":"120","title":"Yes","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":59.09,"resources":[]},{"id":"121","title":"No ","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"2","pct":40.91,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.