Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 514
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 514

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Python-sqlparse Moderate Service Disruption Resolution 2026-3179-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Python-SQLParse Moderate Denial of Service Fix 2026-3180-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE python3-sqlparse Moderate DoS Bug Fix SUSE-SU-2026-3181-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE 15.6 Multipath-Tools Moderate Disk Heap Issue Vuln 2026-3184-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux 10 acl Important Symlink Traversal Threat RLSA-2026-42739

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux glibc Moderate Security Fix Denial Service 2026-42694

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Rockylinux Esm H800
Rocky

Rocky Linux Dovecot Important Denial of Service Vulnern RLSA-2026-41988

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux 10 c-ares Important Use-After-Free Issue RLSA-2026-42096

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux python3.14 Important CPU Denial of Service Vuln RLSA-2026-40856

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":50,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200
Ls Advisories Scientific Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorymoderateman-in-the-middle

Scientific Linux: CVE-2010-2792 Moderate: qspice-client Security Issue

Moderate: qspice-client security update. Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:36:30 -0500 Reply-To: Troy Dawson Sender: Security Errata for Scientific Linux From: Troy Dawson Subject: Security ERRATA Moderate: qspice-client on SL5.x i386/x86_64 Comments: To: "This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." Synopsis: Moderate: qspice-client security update Issue date: 2010-08-25 CVE Names: CVE-2010-2792 The qspice-client package provides the client side of the SPICE protocol. A race condition was found in the way the SPICE Mozilla Firefox plug-in and the SPICE client communicated. A local attacker could use this flaw to trick the plug-in and the SPICE client into communicating over an attacker-controlled socket, possibly gaining access to authentication details, or resulting in a man-in-the-middle attack on the SPICE connection. (CVE-2010-2792) NOTE: Because qspice-client was originally only x86_64, there are several dependencies for i386 going out with this errata. SL 5.x SRPMS: qspice-client-0.3.0-4.el5_5.src.rpm i386: qspice-client-0.3.0-4.el5_5.i386.rpm Dependancies: celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.i386.rpm celt051-devel-0.5.1.3-0.el5.i386.rpm log4cpp-1.0-9.el5.i386.rpm log4cpp-devel-1.0-9.el5.i386.rpm log4cpp-docs-1.0-9.el5.i386.rpm qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.el5.i386.rpm qcairo-devel-1.8.7.1-3.el5.i386.rpm qffmpeg-devel-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.i386.rpm qffmpeg-devel-0.4.9-0.16.20080908.el5_5.i386.rpm qffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.el5.i386.rpm qffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.16.20080908.el5_5.i386.rpm qpixman-0.13.3-4.el5.i386.rpm qpixman-devel-0.13.3-4.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: qspice-client-0.3.0-4.el5_5.x86_64.rpm -Connie Sieh -Troy Dawson . A recent update to the qspice-client for Scientific Linux addresses a communication vulnerability that could allow for man-in-the-middle attacks.. Qspice Client, Scientific Linux, Communication Flaw, Security Update, Authentication Risk. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 25, 2010 Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":50,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics