Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 464
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 464

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Rockylinux Esm H800
Rocky

Rocky Linux 8 RLSA-2026-42550 kernel-rt Important Security Fixes

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux RLSA-2026-42552 Kernel Important Security Fix

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux RLSA-2026-42733 glibc Moderate Information Disclosure and DoS

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 Kernel Important Security Fix for net/can 2026-f1fc7772c3

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Nuclei Important Cross-site Scripting DoS Threat 2026-d36ca2dd19

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Important Fix CVE-2026-58101

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-syslog Critical Path Traversal DoS Vuln 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Rust RPKI Critical Path Traversal Issues Fix 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Routinator Important Security Fixes CVE-2026-49232 to 49235

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200
Ls Advisories Scientific Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorymoderatesecurity update

SciLinux OpenSSL Updates: CVE-2008-7270 Moderate Ciphersuite Flaw

Moderate: openssl security update. Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:46:22 -0600 Reply-To: Troy Dawson Sender: Security Errata for Scientific Linux From: Troy Dawson Subject: Security ERRATA Moderate: openssl on SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64 Comments: To: "This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Issue date: 2010-12-13 CVE Names: CVE-2008-7270 CVE-2009-3245 CVE-2010-4180 A ciphersuite downgrade flaw was found in the OpenSSL SSL/TLS server code. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to change the ciphersuite associated with a cached session stored on the server, if the server enabled the SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG option, possibly forcing the client to use a weaker ciphersuite after resuming the session. (CVE-2010-4180, CVE-2008-7270) Note: With this update, setting the SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG option has no effect and this bug workaround can no longer be enabled. It was discovered that OpenSSL did not always check the return value of the bn_wexpand() function. An attacker able to trigger a memory allocation failure in that function could possibly crash an application using the OpenSSL library and its UBSEC hardware engine support. (CVE-2009-3245 - SL4 Only) For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. SL 4.x SRPMS: openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.src.rpm i386: openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i386.rpm openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i686.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i386.rpm openssl-perl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i386.rpm x86_64: openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i686.rpm openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.i386.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_8.6.x86_64.rpm SL 5.x SRPMS: openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.src.rpm i386: openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i386.rpm openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i386.rpm openssl-perl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i386.rpm x86_64: openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i686.rpm openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.i386.rpm openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7.x86_64.rpm -Connie Sieh -Troy Dawson . The OpenSSL enhancement shields against ciphersuite downgrades and memory vulnerabilities on Scientific Linux. Restart services to ensure changes take effect.. openssl Security Update, Scientific Linux, Ciphersuite Downgrade, Moderate CVE. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 13, 2010 •Important Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics