Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 591
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 591

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
198

Arch Linux: 201906-16 High: dbus Access Restriction Bypass

The package dbus before version 1.12.16-1 is vulnerable to access restriction bypass. . Arch Linux Security Advisory ASA-201906-16 ========================================= Severity: High Date : 2019-06-18 CVE-ID : CVE-2019-12749 Package : dbus Type : access restriction bypass Remote : No Link : https://security.archlinux.org/AVG-974 Summary ====== The package dbus before version 1.12.16-1 is vulnerable to access restriction bypass. Resolution ========= Upgrade to 1.12.16-1. # pacman -Syu "dbus> =1.12.16-1" The problem has been fixed upstream in version 1.12.16. Workaround ========= None. Description ========== It has been discovered that dbus before 1.12.16 allows cookie spoofing because of symlink mishandling in the reference implementation of DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 in the libdbus library. This issue only affects the DBUS_COOKIE_SHA1 authentication mechanism. A malicious client with write access to its own home directory could manipulate a ~/.dbus-keyrings symlink to cause a DBusServer with a different uid to read and write in unintended locations. In the worst case, this could result in the DBusServer reusing a cookie that is known to the malicious client, and treating that cookie as evidence that a subsequent client connection came from an attacker-chosen uid, allowing authentication bypass. Impact ===== A local attacker could use this issue to bypass authentication and escalate privileges. References ========= https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/11/2 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/-/issues/269 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/-/commit/47b1a4c41004bf494b87370987b222c934b19016 https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2019-12749 . Arch Linux Security Advisory ASA-201906-16 ========================================= Severity: High . package, version, vulnerable, restriction, bypass, linux. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jun 19, 2019 ArchLinux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200