Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 428
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 428

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
87

Debian DSA-3956-1 Moderate: ConnMan Stack Overflow Remote Execution Risk

Security consultants in NRI Secure Technologies discovered a stack overflow vulnerability in ConnMan, a network manager for embedded devices. An attacker with control of the DNS responses to the DNS proxy in ConnMan might crash the service and, in same cases, remotely execute . - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-3956-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. https://www.debian.org/security/ Luciano Bello August 27, 2017 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : connman CVE ID : CVE-2017-12865 Debian Bug : 872844 Security consultants in NRI Secure Technologies discovered a stack overflow vulnerability in ConnMan, a network manager for embedded devices. An attacker with control of the DNS responses to the DNS proxy in ConnMan might crash the service and, in same cases, remotely execute arbitrary commands in the host running the service. For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in version 1.21-1.2+deb8u1. For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in version 1.33-3+deb9u1. For the testing distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in version 1.33-3+deb9u1. For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 1.35-1. We recommend that you upgrade your connman packages. Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Address the potential stack overflow vulnerability in ConnMan by applying the Debian security updates outlined in DSA-3956-1, enhancing overall system security and safeguarding user data.. ConnMan Security, Debian Update, Stack Overflow Threat, Remote Execution Risk. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 27, 2017 Debian
89

Fedora 22: FEDORA-2016-1ab53bf440 Moderate: Bind DNS Threat

Update to the latest upstream version due to security fixes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2016-1ab53bf440 2016-02-01 20:30:53.300559 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name : bind Product : Fedora 22 Version : 9.10.3 Release : 8.P3.fc22 URL : Summary : The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server Description : BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of the DNS (Domain Name System) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named), which resolves host names to IP addresses; a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating properly. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Update Information: Update to the latest upstream version due to security fixes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- References: [ 1 ] Bug #1300051 - CVE-2015-8704 CVE-2015-8705 bind: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300051 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This update can be installed with the "yum" update program. Use su -c 'yum update bind' at the command line. For more information, refer to "Managing Software with yum", available at . All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/security/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ package-announce mailing list This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-announce.lists.fedoraproject.org/ . Keep informed about the security patch for Fedora 22's bind, focusing on essentialremedies along with guidance for quick implementation.. Fedora 22, Bind DNS, Security Update, Upstream Version, DNS Security. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 02, 2016 Important Fedora
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200