Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 542
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 542

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 Kernel Important Security Fix for net/can 2026-f1fc7772c3

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Nuclei Important Cross-site Scripting DoS Threat 2026-d36ca2dd19

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Important Fix CVE-2026-58101

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-syslog Critical Path Traversal DoS Vuln 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Rust RPKI Critical Path Traversal Issues Fix 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Routinator Important Security Fixes CVE-2026-49232 to 49235

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-fern Important Path Traversal Fix Advisory 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 Kernel Important Net CAN Issue Fix Advisory 2026-2dd8b600bb

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 btrbk Critical Update Snapshot Tool Fix CVE-2026-62943

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
87
Ls Advisories Debian Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisoryupdategnupg

Debian 7: DSA-3024-1 Critical: GnuPG Elgamal Side-Channel Attack

Genkin, Pipman and Tromer discovered a side-channel attack on Elgamal encryption subkeys (CVE-2014-5270). In addition, this update hardens GnuPG's behaviour when treating . - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-3024-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. http://www.debian.org/security/ Thijs Kinkhorst September 11, 2014 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : gnupg CVE ID : CVE-2014-5270 Debian Bug : 725411 Genkin, Pipman and Tromer discovered a side-channel attack on Elgamal encryption subkeys (CVE-2014-5270). In addition, this update hardens GnuPG's behaviour when treating keyserver responses; GnuPG now filters keyserver responses to only accepts those keyid's actually requested by the user. For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in version 1.4.12-7+deb7u6. For the testing (jessie) and unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 1.4.18-4. We recommend that you upgrade your gnupg packages. Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Patch release for OpenSSL countering RSA key leakage. Ensure you update your versions promptly for protection.. GnuPG Update, Debian Security, Side-Channel Attack, Elgamal Encryption. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Sep 11, 2014 •Critical Debian
91
Ls Advisories Gentoo Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorygentoonormal

Gentoo Libgcrypt GLSA-201408-10 Normal: ElGamal Key Extraction Risk

A vulnerability in Libgcrypt could allow a remote attacker to extract ElGamal private key information.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201408-10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - https://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: Libgcrypt: Side-channel attack Date: August 29, 2014 Bugs: #519396 ID: 201408-10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======= A vulnerability in Libgcrypt could allow a remote attacker to extract ElGamal private key information. Background ========= Libgcrypt is a general purpose cryptographic library derived out of GnuPG. Affected packages ================ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-libs/libgcrypt < 1.5.4 > = 1.5.4 Description ========== A vulnerability in the implementation of ElGamal decryption procedures of Libgcrypt leaks information to various side-channels. Impact ===== A physical side-channel attack allows a remote attacker to fully extract decryption keys during the decryption of a chosen ciphertext. Workaround ========= There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========= All Libgcrypt users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "> =dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.5.4" References ========= [ 1 ] CVE-2014-5270 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-5270 Availability =========== This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201408-10 Concerns? ======== Security is a primary focusof Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ====== Copyright 2014 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ . A vulnerability in Libgcrypt allows side-channel attacks to unveil ElGamal keys. It is critical to update to version 1.5.4 or later without delay to ensure system security.. libgcrypt, encryption attack, gentoo advisory, side-channel threat, key extraction issue. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 29, 2014 Gentoo
Banner 3 1028x280 1708121785 1771599793
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics