Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 524
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 524

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE ImageMagick Moderate Memory Leak Fix Advisory 2026-3193-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Leap 15.5 sssd Important Privilege Escalation Fix 2026-3195-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu python-aiohttp Important DoS Issues Fix 2026-8591-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Debian Large Esm H800
Debian

Debian BIND9 Important Cache Poisoning Denial of Service DSA-6395-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Debianlts Large Esm H900
Debian LTS

Debian LTS Important Security Patch Released for Firefox ESR DLA-4695-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Debian Large Esm H900
Debian

Debian Firefox ESR Important Code Execution Risks DSA-6394-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Python-sqlparse Moderate Service Disruption Resolution 2026-3179-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Python-SQLParse Moderate Denial of Service Fix 2026-3180-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE python3-sqlparse Moderate DoS Bug Fix SUSE-SU-2026-3181-1

Calendar White Jul 22, 2026
moderate
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":50,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
100
Ls Advisories Suse Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorymoderateOpenSUSE

openSUSE Leap 15.6 gnome-remote-desktop Moderate Resource Drain 2026-0766-1

An update that solves one vulnerability can now be installed.. # Security update for gnome-remote-desktop Announcement ID: SUSE-SU-2026:0766-1 Release Date: 2026-03-03T13:02:48Z Rating: moderate References: * bsc#1244053 Cross-References: * CVE-2025-5024 CVSS scores: * CVE-2025-5024 ( SUSE ): 6.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H * CVE-2025-5024 ( SUSE ): 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H * CVE-2025-5024 ( NVD ): 7.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H Affected Products: * openSUSE Leap 15.6 An update that solves one vulnerability can now be installed. ## Description: This update for gnome-remote-desktop fixes the following issue: * CVE-2025-5024: an unauthenticated attacker can exhaust system resources (bsc#1244053). ## Patch Instructions: To install this SUSE update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch". Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product: * openSUSE Leap 15.6 zypper in -t patch SUSE-2026-766=1 openSUSE-SLE-15.6-2026-766=1 ## Package List: * openSUSE Leap 15.6 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 i586) * gnome-remote-desktop-debugsource-45.1-150600.3.6.1 * gnome-remote-desktop-debuginfo-45.1-150600.3.6.1 * gnome-remote-desktop-45.1-150600.3.6.1 * openSUSE Leap 15.6 (noarch) * gnome-remote-desktop-lang-45.1-150600.3.6.1 ## References: * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5024.html * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244053 . A security advisory for gnome-remote-desktop addressing a moderate vulnerability in openSUSE 15.6. Patch available now.. gnome-remote-desktop security advisory openSUSE update. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Mar 03, 2026 SuSE
99
Ls Advisories Slackware Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorydenial of servicecritical

Slackware 13.0: 2009-343-01 Critical: Ntp Denial Of Service

New ntp packages are available for Slackware 8.1, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2, 11.0, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 13.0, and -current to fix a security issue. If a spoofed mode 7 packet is sent to a vulnerable NTP daemon it may cause CPU and/or disk space exhaustion, resulting in a denial of service. . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [slackware-security] ntp (SSA:2009-343-01) New ntp packages are available for Slackware 8.1, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0, 10.1, 10.2, 11.0, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 13.0, and -current to fix a security issue. If a spoofed mode 7 packet is sent to a vulnerable NTP daemon it may cause CPU and/or disk space exhaustion, resulting in a denial of service. More details about this issue may be found in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3563 Here are the details from the Slackware 13.0 ChangeLog: +--------------------------+ patches/packages/ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack13.0.txz: Upgraded. Prevent a denial-of-service attack involving spoofed mode 7 packets. For more information, see: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3563 (* Security fix *) +--------------------------+ Where to find the new packages: +-----------------------------+ HINT: Getting slow download speeds from ftp.slackware.com? Give slackware.osuosl.org a try. This is another primary FTP site for Slackware that can be considerably faster than downloading directly from ftp.slackware.com. Thanks to the friendly folks at the OSU Open Source Lab (https://osuosl.org/) for donating additional FTP and rsync hosting to the Slackware project! :-) Also see the "Get Slack" section on http://www.slackware.com/ for additional mirror sites near you. Updated package for Slackware 8.1: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-8.1/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i386-2_slack8.1.tgz Updated package for Slackware 9.0: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-9.0/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i386-2_slack9.0.tgz Updated package for Slackware9.1: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-9.1/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack9.1.tgz Updated package for Slackware 10.0: Updated package for Slackware 10.1: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-10.1/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack10.1.tgz Updated package for Slackware 10.2: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-10.2/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack10.2.tgz Updated package for Slackware 11.0: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-11.0/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-3_slack11.0.tgz Updated package for Slackware 12.0: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-12.0/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.0.tgz Updated package for Slackware 12.1: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-12.1/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.1.tgz Updated package for Slackware 12.2: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-12.2/patches/packages/ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.2.tgz Updated package for Slackware 13.0: Updated package for Slackware x86_64 13.0: Updated package for Slackware -current: Updated package for Slackware x86_64 -current: MD5 signatures: +-------------+ Slackware 8.1 package: cf159af385eff1f3e7ee97dd31181a50 ntp-4.2.2p3-i386-2_slack8.1.tgz Slackware 9.0 package: 281891ce933cc51b4da7c4856c2e9a7a ntp-4.2.2p3-i386-2_slack9.0.tgz Slackware 9.1 package: 8ba51d005758c1d42db139730e9552ab ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack9.1.tgz Slackware 10.0 package: d4494f109da2f947515bf8ca40db2e6b ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack10.0.tgz Slackware 10.1 package: 3ed65c1bda71156978424de0f13436f9 ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack10.1.tgz Slackware 10.2 package: 345eced7dc1135943f119c8ae066fbde ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-2_slack10.2.tgz Slackware 11.0 package: e5fbcad45bb274ebee2c6c11b0c18a73 ntp-4.2.2p3-i486-3_slack11.0.tgz Slackware 12.0 package: d367da8f356c71ee915957280fe731b2 ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.0.tgz Slackware 12.1 package: 3632138b29c2f73f027be03b220da30c ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.1.tgz Slackware 12.2package: 450f8b3cdf63cc61ea6d2baa9c9ebb00 ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack12.2.tgz Slackware 13.0 package: af0c7662fb258ffd6f34f4ca68ee6553 ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack13.0.txz Slackware x86_64 13.0 package: 77dfe4dfe7f35e02e9cd455b0d82e79f ntp-4.2.4p8-x86_64-1_slack13.0.txz Slackware -current package: 22f81c7c0856aa55846323f9376dbdbf ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1.txz Slackware x86_64 -current package: 1d6562a98631f5f8601f696a7b4d7ed7 ntp-4.2.4p8-x86_64-1.txz Installation instructions: +------------------------+ Upgrade the package as root: # upgradepkg ntp-4.2.4p8-i486-1_slack13.0.txz Then, restart ntpd. +-----+ . Slackware 2010-345-02 includes kernel patch addressing memory leak vulnerability, enhancing system stability against potential exploits.. Ntp Daemon Security, Slackware Updates, Denial Of Service Fix. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 10, 2009 •Critical Slackware
Banner 3 1028x280 1708121785 1771599793
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":50,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics