Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Debian Large Esm H800
Debian

Debian exim4 Important Privilege Escalation Vuln DSA-6400-1

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Important
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia Libevent Critical Security Update CVE-2026-63379 Advisory 2026-0294

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Critical
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia Transmission Critical Clickjacking Vulnerability Fix 2026-0293

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Critical
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Leap 16.0 Advisory 2026-21435-1 perl-XML-Bare Moderate Risk

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Leap 16.0 transport Significant Security Update CVE-2026-39821

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Leap 16.0 Gh Important Security Threat CVE-2026-39821

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Leap 16.0 net-tools Low Denial of Service CVE-2024-58251

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Low
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Perl-HTTP-Date Moderate CPU Exhaustion Fix CVE-2026-14741

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE ImageMagick Important Memory Leak Policy Bypass Vuln 2026-21426-1

Calendar White Jul 24, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
203
Ls Advisories Mageia Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorysystem integrityapache batik

Mageia 7: 2021-0168 Critical SSRF Attack Fix for Apache Batik

A flaw was found in the Apache Batik library, where it is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (SSRF) via "xlink:href" attributes. This flaw allows an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system integrity (CVE-2019-17566). . MGASA-2021-0168 - Updated batik packages fix security vulnerabilities Publication date: 02 Apr 2021 URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2021-0168.html Type: security Affected Mageia releases: 7 CVE: CVE-2019-17566, CVE-2020-11987 A flaw was found in the Apache Batik library, where it is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (SSRF) via "xlink:href" attributes. This flaw allows an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system integrity (CVE-2019-17566). The Apache Batik library is vulnerable to SSRF via the NodePickerPanel that allow an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests (CVE-2020-11987). References: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26800 - https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/24/2 - https://xmlgraphics.apache.org/security.html - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it./thread/N3V3MJVGDUNTVPXXGYR335PZJJK7LDXC/ - https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17566 - https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11987 SRPMS: - 7/core/batik-1.13-1.3.mga7 . Essential security patches for Apache Batik in Mageia address SSRF and integrity vulnerabilities as of April 2021.. Apache Batik, SSRF Attack, Mageia Update, System Integrity, Security Fix. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Apr 02, 2021 •Critical Mageia
203
Ls Advisories Mageia Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorycritical issuesecurity issue

Mageia 7: MGASA-2021-0006 Critical: Execution Bypass in Dash

Code was executed even if noexec ("-n") was specified. (bdo#58288 / bsc#1178978) References: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27655 . MGASA-2021-0006 - Updated dash packages fix a security vulnerability Publication date: 08 Jan 2021 URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2021-0006.html Type: security Affected Mageia releases: 7 Code was executed even if noexec ("-n") was specified. (bdo#58288 / bsc#1178978) References: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27655 - https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/11/3 - https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/12/1 - https://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-security-updates/2020-November/007839.html - SRPMS: - 7/core/dash-0.5.10.2-1.1.mga7 . Dash components refreshed to rectify a vulnerability that enabled execution even when noexec was set. Insights included.. dash Security Update,Mageia Advisory,Execution Risk,Mageia Update. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jan 08, 2021 •Critical Mageia
Banner 3 1028x280 1708121785 1771599793
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics