Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 461
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 461

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 Kernel Important Security Fix for net/can 2026-f1fc7772c3

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Nuclei Important Cross-site Scripting DoS Threat 2026-d36ca2dd19

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Important Fix CVE-2026-58101

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-syslog Critical Path Traversal DoS Vuln 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Rust RPKI Critical Path Traversal Issues Fix 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Routinator Important Security Fixes CVE-2026-49232 to 49235

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-fern Important Path Traversal Fix Advisory 2026-659cb50390

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 Kernel Important Net CAN Issue Fix Advisory 2026-2dd8b600bb

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 btrbk Critical Update Snapshot Tool Fix CVE-2026-62943

Calendar White Jul 21, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200
Ls Advisories Scientific Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorysecurity issuebug fix

Low Severity Security Advisory for Mailman Fix in Scientific Linux 4.x

Low: mailman security and bug fix update. Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:11:49 -0600 Reply-To: Troy Dawson Sender: Security Errata for Scientific Linux From: Troy Dawson Subject: Security ERRATA for mailman on SL4.x i386/x86_64 Comments: To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Synopsis: Low: mailman security and bug fix update Issue date: 2007-11-15 CVE Names: CVE-2006-4624 A flaw was found in Mailman. A remote attacker could spoof messages in the error log, and possibly trick the administrator into visiting malicious URLs via a carriage return/line feed sequence in the URI. (CVE-2006-4624) As well, these updated packages fix the following bugs: * canceling a subscription on the confirm subscription request page caused mailman to crash. * editing the sender filter caused all spam filter rules to be deleted. * the migrate-fhs script was not included. * the mailman init script returned a zero (success) exit code even when an incorrect command was given. For example, the "mailman foo" command returned a zero exit code. In these updated packages the mailmain init script returns the correct exit codes. SL 4.x SRPMS: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.6.src.rpm i386: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.6.i386.rpm x86_64: mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.6.x86_64.rpm -Connie Sieh -Troy Dawson . Mailman release for SL 4.x addresses vulnerabilities and maintenance corrections. Essential for users to update and ensure safety.. mailman fix, scientific linux, security update, bug fixes, remote attack. . Severity: Low. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 15, 2007 •Low Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics