Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 598
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 598

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 opkssh Low GQ-commitment PK Tokens Advisory 2026-168280f3c4

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Low
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Perl-Mojolicious Important CSRF Token Fix FEDORA-2026-6f12b08313

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 RPM Heap Overflow and Command Injection Vulnerability Advisory

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 44 opkssh Low GQ-commitment PK Tokens Issue Advisory 2026-a0bf40ecfe

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Low
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 perl-Mojolicious Critical CSRF Attack Mitigation 2026-4334fd85bc

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 rpm Command Injection Buffer Overflow Fix for 2026-9985882270

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Suse Large Esm H800
SuSE

SUSE wpa_supplicant Low RADIUS Auth Security Issue 2026-3281-1

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Low
Suse Large Esm H900
SuSE

SUSE perl-DBI Important Code Execution DoS Issues 2026-3283-1

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Suse Large Esm H900
SuSE

SUSE Java 11 OpenJDK Important Security Update 2026-3284-1

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
203
Ls Advisories Mageia Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisoryupdatebugfix

Mageia 10 neochat Bugfix Advisory 2026-0070 for users and developers

A bugfix update for Mageia 10 resolves an issue where neochat would not start if the purpose package was not installed, by adding the necessary dependency.. Publication date: 27 Jul 2026 URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2026-0070.html Type: bugfix Affected Mageia releases: 10 Description: If purpose wasn't installed, neochat would not start. This update adds the missing dependency on the purpose package. References: - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35978 SRPMS: - 10/core/neochat-25.12.1-1.1.mga10 . Fixes missing dependency in neochat for Mageia 10 with crucial updates for better functionality and seamless user experience.. Mageia neochat update bugfix dependency security. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jul 27, 2026 •Important Mageia
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics