Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 521
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 521

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -6 articles for you...
98

CentOS Security Advisory: CESA-2023:4567-01 Urgent: CGI Script Exploit

Temporary files were being created without taking adequate precautions, and therefore a local user could potentially overwrite files with the privileges of the user running emacs.. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated semi packages fix flim vulnerability Advisory ID: RHSA-2004:344-01 Issue date: 2004-08-18 Updated on: 2004-08-18 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux CVE Names: CAN-2004-0422 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Summary: Updated semi packages that fix vulnerabilities in flim temporary file handling are now available. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (Advanced Server) version 2.1 - noarch Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation 2.1 - noarch Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 2.1 - noarch Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 2.1 - noarch 3. Problem description: The semi package includes a MIME library for GNU Emacs and XEmacs used by the wl mail package. Tatsuya Kinoshita discovered a vulnerability in flim, an emacs library for working with Internet messages included in the semi package. Temporary files were being created without taking adequate precautions, and therefore a local user could potentially overwrite files with the privileges of the user running emacs. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2004-0422 to this issue. Users of semi are advised to upgrade to these packages, which contain a backported patch fixing this issue. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure that all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Use Red Hat Network to download and update your packages. To launch the Red Hat Update Agent, use the following command: up2date For information on how to install packages manually, refer to the following Web page for the System Administration or Customization guide specific to your system: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/10/ 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ for more info): 124396 - CAN-2004-0422 flim temporary file vulnerability affects semi packages 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (Advanced Server) version 2.1: SRPMS: dfcfc66f790902402b72eedd3a806284 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.src.rpm noarch: 23c1b96f8d9fc3d3aefa21812adbd5a1 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm 2e5dc06d5aadf594ae7222706e230e0e semi-xemacs-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm Red Hat Linux Advanced Workstation 2.1: SRPMS: dfcfc66f790902402b72eedd3a806284 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.src.rpm noarch: 23c1b96f8d9fc3d3aefa21812adbd5a1 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm 2e5dc06d5aadf594ae7222706e230e0e semi-xemacs-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 2.1: SRPMS: dfcfc66f790902402b72eedd3a806284 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.src.rpm noarch: 23c1b96f8d9fc3d3aefa21812adbd5a1 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm 2e5dc06d5aadf594ae7222706e230e0e semi-xemacs-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 2.1: SRPMS: dfcfc66f790902402b72eedd3a806284 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.src.rpm noarch: 23c1b96f8d9fc3d3aefa21812adbd5a1 semi-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm 2e5dc06d5aadf594ae7222706e230e0e semi-xemacs-1.14.3-8.72.EL.1.noarch.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from 7. References: Debian -- Security Information -- DSA-500-1 flim CVE -CVE-2004-0422 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is . More contact details at Copyright 2004 Red Hat, Inc. . Boost your Emacs proficiency on RHEL by refining semi package settings, implementing strict file management, adjusting backup options, and guiding users to avoid unintentional file overwrites. Red Hat Advisory,Flim Security,Temporary File Fix,Semi Package Update. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 19, 2004 Critical Red Hat
98

Red Hat Linux: RHSA-2003:234-01 Critical: Semi Package Overwrite Risk

A vulnerability in semi version 1.14.3 and earlier allows an attackerto overwrite arbitrary files with potentially arbitrary contents using theprivileges of the user running Emacs and semi.. - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated semi packages fix vulnerability Advisory ID: RHSA-2003:234-01 Issue date: 2003-07-23 Updated on: 2003-07-23 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: Cross references: Obsoletes: CVE Names: CAN-2003-0440 - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: Updated semi packages that fix vulnerabilities in semi's temporary file handling are now available for Red Hat Linux 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Linux 7.1 - noarch Red Hat Linux 7.1 for iSeries (64 bit) - noarch Red Hat Linux 7.1 for pSeries (64 bit) - noarch Red Hat Linux 7.2 - noarch Red Hat Linux 7.3 - noarch Red Hat Linux 8.0 - noarch Red Hat Linux 9 - noarch 3. Problem description: semi is a MIME library for GNU Emacs and XEmacs used by the wl mail package. A vulnerability in semi version 1.14.3 and earlier allows an attacker to overwrite arbitrary files with potentially arbitrary contents using the privileges of the user running Emacs and semi. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2003-0440 to this issue. Users of semi are advised to upgrade to these packages, which contain a backported patch correcting this issue. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. To update all RPMs for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Fvh [filenames] where [filenames] is a list of the RPMs you wish to upgrade. Only those RPMs which are currently installed will be updated. Those RPMs which are not installed but included in the list will not be updated. Note that you can alsouse wildcards (*.rpm) if your current directory *only* contains the desired RPMs. Please note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network. Many people find this an easier way to apply updates. To use Red Hat Network, launch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command: up2date This will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate RPMs being upgraded on your system. 5. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 7.1: SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 7.1 for iSeries (64 bit): SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 7.1 for pSeries (64 bit): SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 7.2: SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 7.3: SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 8.0: SRPMS: noarch: Red Hat Linux 9: SRPMS: noarch: 6. Verification: MD5 sum Package Name - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 442949226f8868df1a9350d8cc4cd1d6 7.1/en/os/SRPMS/semi-1.13.7-10.src.rpm e042ec88e785f8b376b454cdfd192707 7.1/en/os/noarch/semi-1.13.7-10.noarch.rpm 442949226f8868df1a9350d8cc4cd1d6 7.1/en/os/iSeries/SRPMS/semi-1.13.7-10.src.rpm e042ec88e785f8b376b454cdfd192707 7.1/en/os/iSeries/noarch/semi-1.13.7-10.noarch.rpm 442949226f8868df1a9350d8cc4cd1d6 7.1/en/os/pSeries/SRPMS/semi-1.13.7-10.src.rpm e042ec88e785f8b376b454cdfd192707 7.1/en/os/pSeries/noarch/semi-1.13.7-10.noarch.rpm da8628629ed020b2bc9e06abf1524af3 7.2/en/os/SRPMS/semi-1.14.3-8.72.src.rpm c1e66bb252d95a81f63b0098ecdb5f83 7.2/en/os/noarch/semi-1.14.3-8.72.noarch.rpm 7653ba36b625f4f786e39573be802dfa 7.2/en/os/noarch/semi-xemacs-1.14.3-8.72.noarch.rpm 729f691aea3136030a34ebd1eadb9c23 7.3/en/os/SRPMS/semi-1.14.3-15.src.rpm 3c28749f6c99fc6d50f79fead6b8187b 7.3/en/os/noarch/semi-1.14.3-15.noarch.rpm b95c368e446ceda1e96a7ea747944cf5 7.3/en/os/noarch/semi-xemacs-1.14.3-15.noarch.rpm f085d6869ce59765fa72da26cec6b1f2 8.0/en/os/SRPMS/wl-2.8.1-9.src.rpm 84834aecf01ec7f0d7ce3ce9be830f648.0/en/os/noarch/wl-2.8.1-9.noarch.rpm 8e6719831cb4f5a68c92f497a61a414c 8.0/en/os/noarch/wl-common-2.8.1-9.noarch.rpm 6ff8d828af3407e6e7000f2b8d787f82 8.0/en/os/noarch/wl-xemacs-2.8.1-9.noarch.rpm 3f2c94d3cc527ec7e54532931eb524b3 9/en/os/SRPMS/wl-2.10.1-1.1.src.rpm b9fe8fb05a04fffa558a7e656746e603 9/en/os/noarch/wl-2.10.1-1.1.noarch.rpm d1f67f532368aba67910fb4ce7f7042d 9/en/os/noarch/wl-common-2.10.1-1.1.noarch.rpm 7122676e3a598eb8bb003e9d6c1ac3b6 9/en/os/noarch/wl-xemacs-2.10.1-1.1.noarch.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key is available from Product Signing Keys - Red Hat Customer Portal You can verify each package with the following command: rpm --checksig -v If you only wish to verify that each package has not been corrupted or tampered with, examine only the md5sum with the following command: md5sum 7. References: Debian -- Security Information -- DSA-339-1 semi CVE -CVE-2003-0440 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is . More contact details at All Red Hat products Copyright 2003 Red Hat, Inc. . The notification issued by Canonical highlights a critical update for the core application suite, addressing security flaws that may allow remote code execution.. Red Hat SecOps, Semi Package Fix, Arbitrary Code Risk. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jul 24, 2003 Critical Red Hat
87

Debian: DSA 337-1 Moderate: Insecure File Management in Semi and Wemi

semi, a MIME library for GNU Emacs, does not take appropriate security precautions when creating temporary files.. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA 337-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Debian -- Security Information Matt Zimmerman July 6th, 2003 Debian -- Debian security FAQ - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : semi, wemi Vulnerability : insecure temporary file Problem-Type : local Debian-specific: no CVE Ids : CAN-2003-0440 semi, a MIME library for GNU Emacs, does not take appropriate security precautions when creating temporary files. This bug could potentially be exploited to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running Emacs and semi, potentially with contents supplied by the attacker. wemi is a fork of semi, and contains the same bug. For the stable distribution (woody) this problem has been fixed in semi version 1.14.3.cvs.2001.08.10-1woody2 and wemi version 1.14.0.20010802wemiko-1.3. For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in semi version 1.14.5+20030609-1. The unstable distribution does not contain a wemi package. We recommend that you update your semi and wemi packages. Upgrade Instructions - -------------------- wget url will fetch the file for you dpkg -i file.deb will install the referenced file. If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for sources.list as given below: apt-get update will update the internal database apt-get upgrade will install corrected packages You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the footer to the proper configuration. Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias woody - -------------------------------- Source archives: Size/MD5 checksum: 620 3949b7a3bc726a8f96b24adf5c965e37 Size/MD5 checksum: 20481abd8c72197b6fc901c454247d8750ea4 Size/MD5 checksum: 134788 2f0dd2581b1350a0a5249bb6c8ea18f0 Size/MD5 checksum: 630 a0dfbca5275f27cbf0a5849390c15a25 Size/MD5 checksum: 29933 23b2c6e66f69683c4892d7ac16ff7337 Size/MD5 checksum: 138332 e58f2eda9401df7493584e7f064b2ed1 Architecture independent components: Size/MD5 checksum: 175496 73a1be04f4457ae6c92e487dc42c09d0 Size/MD5 checksum: 173030 241fc879552c26a4a8a62b9874adaab0 These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on its next revision. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For apt-get: deb Debian -- Security Information stable/updates main For dpkg-ftp: dists/stable/updates/main Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Package info: `apt-cache show ' and https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages . Debian advisory highlights an insecure file handling risk in Semi and Wemi, prompt software updates are advised.. Debian Security Advisory, Insecure File Handling, Semi Package Update. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jul 07, 2003 Debian
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200