Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 420
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 420

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":4,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
98

Red Hat 6.1 RHSA-1999:055-01 Moderate: Syslogd DoS Threat

A denial of service attack exists in the system log daemon, syslogd. . Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Package syslogd Synopsis Denial of service attack in syslogd Advisory ID RHSA-1999:055-01 Issue Date 1999-11-19 Updated on 1999-11-19 Keywords syslogd sysklogd stream socket Cross References bugtraq id #809 1. Topic: A denial of service attack exists in the system log daemon, syslogd. 2. Problem description: The syslog daemon by default used unix domain stream sockets for receiving local log connections. By opening a large number of connections to the log daemon, the user could make the system unresponsive. Thanks go to Olaf Kirch (okir@monad.swb.de) for noting the vulnerability and providing patches. 3. Bug IDs fixed: (see bugzilla for more information) 4. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Linux 6.1: Red Hat Linux 6.1 is not vulnerable to this security issue. However, users of Red Hat Linux 6.1/Intel may wish to upgrade to the latest package to fix a problem in the syslog daemon where log connections would be reset after the syslog daemon is restarted. 5. Obsoleted by: None 6. Conflicts with: None 7. RPMs required: Intel: sysklogd-1.3.31-14.i386.rpm Source: sysklogd-1.3.31-14.src.rpm 8. Solution: For each RPM for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Uvh filename where filename is the name of the RPM. libc updates are needed for Red Hat Linux 4.2 for the Intel and Sparc architectures so that logging will work correctly with the upgraded sysklogd packages. Note: Upgrading to these sysklogd packages may impair the logging abilities of some software that does not use the standard C library syslog(3) interface to thesystem logs. Such software may have to be changed to use datagram connections instead of stream connections to the log socket. 9. Verification: MD5 sum Package Name ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8e59b61b8b1a9356ea675d7234b801d8 i386/sysklogd-1.3.31-14.i386.rpm 55cc22adb6b3272ef23763e89309af24 SRPMS/sysklogd-1.3.31-14.src.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat, Inc. for security. Our key is available at: You can verify each package with the following command: rpm --checksig filename If you only wish to verify that each package has not been corrupted or tampered with, examine only the md5sum with the following command: rpm --checksig --nogpg filename Note that you need RPM > = 3.0 to check GnuPG keys. 10. References: . The latest advisory from Red Hat highlights a critical vulnerability in syslogd leading to potential denial of service attacks. A prompt upgrade is advised to bolster system security.. syslogd, Red Hat, denial of service, security patch. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 07, 1999 Red Hat
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":4,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200