Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 591
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 591

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
202

openSUSE: unbound Moderate Domain Hijacking Attack Fix 2025:4134-1

An update that solves one vulnerability can now be installed.. # Security update for unbound Announcement ID: SUSE-SU-2025:4134-1 Release Date: 2025-11-18T17:11:21Z Rating: moderate References: * bsc#1252525 Cross-References: * CVE-2025-11411 CVSS scores: * CVE-2025-11411 ( SUSE ): 7.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L * CVE-2025-11411 ( SUSE ): 6.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L * CVE-2025-11411 ( NVD ): 5.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X Affected Products: * Basesystem Module 15-SP6 * Basesystem Module 15-SP7 * openSUSE Leap 15.6 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP7 An update that solves one vulnerability can now be installed. ## Description: This update for unbound fixes the following issues: * CVE-2025-11411: Fixed possible domain hijacking attack. (bsc#1252525) ## Patch Instructions: To install this SUSE update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch". Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product: * openSUSE Leap 15.6 zypper in -t patch SUSE-2025-4134=1 openSUSE-SLE-15.6-2025-4134=1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP6 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Basesystem-15-SP6-2025-4134=1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP7 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Basesystem-15-SP7-2025-4134=1 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Packagehub-Subpackages-15-SP6-2025-4134=1 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP7 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Packagehub-Subpackages-15-SP7-2025-4134=1 ## Package List: * openSUSE Leap 15.6 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64 i586) * libunbound8-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-python-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound-devel-mini-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound8-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound-devel-mini-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound-devel-mini-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-python-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-devel-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * openSUSE Leap 15.6 (noarch) * unbound-munin-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP6 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) * libunbound8-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound8-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-devel-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP7 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) * libunbound8-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-anchor-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * libunbound8-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-devel-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP6 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) * unbound-python-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-python-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * SUSE Package Hub 15 15-SP7 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) *unbound-python-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-python-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debugsource-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 * unbound-debuginfo-1.20.0-150600.23.13.1 ## References: * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11411.html * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252525 . An update for unbound solves a domain hijacking vulnerability in openSUSE with a moderate rating.. openSUSE Updates, unbound Security, Moderate Rating, Domain Hijacking, SUSE Linux Updates. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 18, 2025 OpenSUSE
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200