Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 525
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 525

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
100

RedHat: 2023:052 Critical: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in KVM

Cda, a setuid commandline part of xmcd, a X11/Motif audio CD player by Ti Kan , was found vulnerable by a link attack and some bufferoverflows. . ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Package: xmcd Announcement-ID: SuSE-SA:2001:025 Date: Friday, Aug 3rd 2001 18:30 MEST Affected SuSE versions: (6.0, 6.1, 6.2,) 6.3, 6.4, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 Vulnerability Type: local privilege escalation Severity (1-10): 4 SuSE default package: no Other affected systems: yes Content of this advisory: 1) security vulnerability resolved: yes problem description, discussion, solution and upgrade information 2) pending vulnerabilities, solutions, workarounds 3) standard appendix (further information) ______________________________________________________________________________ 1) problem description, brief discussion, solution, upgrade information Cda, a setuid commandline part of xmcd, a X11/Motif audio CD player by Ti Kan , was found vulnerable by a link attack and some bufferoverflows. These bugs could be exploited by an adversary, who has access to the system, to overwrite files or gain higher privileges. As a temporary fix, just remove the setuid bit from cda: /bin/chmod 755 /usr/X11R6/bin/cda or let just trusted users execute cda: /bin/chown root.trusted /usr/X11R6/bin/cda /bin/chmod 4750 /usr/X11R6/bin/cda Don't forget to add these changes to your /etc/permissions.local file Users of SuSE 7.2 with permissions.secure or permissions.paranoid activated are safe, because setuid is already removed. Thanks to Paul Starzetz , who reportes the link attack and to Ti Kan , the author of xmcd, for his fast response and help. New RPMs can be found at the following places. i386 Intel Platform: SuSE-7.2 2e11b84704ab44c61b04f2e9bfde1371 source rpm: 2d934ab9662d3aee69041d2118ead682 SuSE-7.1 dbeb8ddbf8e435d54930d1acef85cfe6 source rpm: 38c24dc21572cfefc3f678bb534457e7 SuSE-7.0 55ef501823f33033d6e649a6df872cf7 source rpm: 6ba4db1799355aef6fe5202164338b5d SuSE-6.4 8f0dd51c4ed7b9dabd554793a98504f3 source rpm: 076151818b5054d40d955bdf060f601b SuSE-6.3 a53b36543b555ad435eebede89324227 source rpm: 4274da4334b67a04d10f2ade67305679 Sparc Platform: SuSE-7.1 b6fb5c9a71c578866fcefd978c3dd469 source rpm: 0c6a783486669cc57b35575edabfd6b4 SuSE-7.0 b7ae66325a2875e97d28ec7b0152dc35 source rpm: 836be977435960908c77d753c47084fb AXP Alpha Platform: SuSE-7.1 b2c1652b694655fbd5635b455355fe59 source rpm: 78af000c592f274fa78019da47463c2f SuSE-7.0 67a11e69a66ee0e5c36f8bd4c67d1e49 source rpm: 17fa48bdd3b20c263c09578391a6da2e SuSE-6.4 c0ee2188da89b7756e143495b2947a41 source rpm: 39acbbe4d54c671f925b342091f4b994 SuSE-6.3 5480828717020d146da0d9413ab8fab8 source rpm: 5a5d4af61d0b4ce629ad19a06d8dcd2b PPC PowerPC Platform: SuSE-7.1 3292bb4e6410aa1d5268fca8540024af source rpm: f6ddf546fa6562ac02d7b56fde58ea11 SuSE-7.0 4bd49ef46dbf59a9155af6322a4a34c3 source rpm: 67762f89ddeec6eb4a99a5919ad35927 SuSE-6.4 295884a4eb13da364b6a8f0b3ae2f69d source rpm: 185fd215007d17348e11982bbc2c2ad1 ______________________________________________________________________________ 2) Pending vulnerabilities in SuSE Distributions and Workarounds: - openssl Currently we check are checking the dependencies of openssl to other dynamic or static linkedapplications on SuSE Linux. An announcement will be released soon. - dqs This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. has found an exploitable buffer overflow bug in the dsh program from the dqs package on SuSE Linux distributions. To workaround the problem, do "chmod -s /usr/bin/dsh" and change the files /etc/permissions* to reflect the change. If you do not need the dqs package, then deinstall it (rpm -e dqs). Packages for most of the supported SuSE Linux distributions are available at the usual location / for download and installation/update. Do not forget to change the files /etc/permissions* to remove the suid-bit from the dsh program. Please note that we will not issue a dedicated security announcement for this specific bug. - pcp Paul Starzetz discovered a security weakness in the setuid root program /usr/share/pcp/bin/pmpost. The common library in pcp trusts the environment that has been supplied by the user, regardless of privileged execution or not. By consequence, a user can specify the configuration file and therefore write to files owned by root. The problem is not based on insecurely following symlinks as stated by Paul Starzetz. The pcp package is not installed by default in SuSE Linux distributions. We have provided update packages for the SuSE Linux distributions version 7.1 and 7.2 that remove the setuid bit from the pmpost binary. Versions before SuSE-7.1 were not affected because the setuid bit was not set. We thank Keith Owens and Mark Goodwin from Silicon Graphics for responding quickly and for publishing a new version of the pcp package which will be included in future releases of the SuSE Linux distribution. For more information see the /usr/share/doc/packages/pcp directory of your SuSE Linux installation after installing the update package, or go to obtained from . Please note that there will not be a dedicated security announcement for this specific bug. - fetchmail(fetchml) New fetchmail packages are available on the ftp server. The packages cure a buffer overflow that can be exploited by sending a victim a specially designed email, waiting for the victim's fetchmail program to pick up the email. We are preparing a security announcement for this problem. - openssh update packages for the openssh package after (and including) SuSE-6.4 are available on our ftp servers ftp.suse.de (for = 7.1). We are currently checking for a non-security related irregularity in sshd's behaviour under faulty setup conditions. - exim SuSE Linux distributions do not contain the exim Mail Transport Agent (See Exim Internet Mailer for details) and are therefore not susceptible to the recently found security-related bugs. - webmin SuSE Linux distributions do not contain the webmin administration web frontend (See / for details) and are therefore not vulnerable to the recently found security-related problems in the software. ______________________________________________________________________________ 3) standard appendix: authenticity verification, additional information - Package authenticity verification: SuSE update packages are available on many mirror ftp servers all over the world. While this service is being considered valuable and important to the free and open source software community, many users wish to be sure about the origin of the package and its content before installing the package. There are two verification methods that can be used independently from each other to prove the authenticity of a downloaded file or rpm package: 1) md5sums as provided in the (cryptographically signed) announcement. 2) using the internal gpg signatures of the rpm package. 1) execute the command md5sum after you downloaded the file from a SuSE ftp server or its mirrors. Then, compare the resulting md5sum with the one that is listed in the announcement. Since the announcement containing the checksums is cryptographically signed (usually using the key This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ), the checksums show proof of the authenticity of the package. We disrecommend to subscribe to security lists which cause the email message containing the announcement to be modified so that the signature does not match after transport through the mailing list software. Downsides: You must be able to verify the authenticity of the announcement in the first place. If RPM packages are being rebuilt and a new version of a package is published on the ftp server, all md5 sums for the files are useless. 2) rpm package signatures provide an easy way to verify the authenticity of an rpm package. Use the command rpm -v --checksig to verify the signature of the package, where is the filename of the rpm package that you have downloaded. Of course, package authenticity verification can only target an uninstalled rpm package file. Prerequisites: a) gpg is installed b) The package is signed using a certain key. The public part of this key must be installed by the gpg program in the directory ~/.gnupg/ under the user's home directory who performs the signature verification (usually root). You can import the key that is used by SuSE in rpm packages for SuSE Linux by saving this announcement to a file ("announcement.txt") and running the command (do "su -" to be root): gpg --batch; gpg < announcement.txt | gpg --import SuSE Linux distributions version 7.1 and thereafter install the key " This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. " upon installation or upgrade, provided that the package gpg is installed. The file containing the public key is placed at the toplevel directory of the first CD (pubring.gpg) and at . - SuSE runs two security mailinglists to which any interested party may subscribe: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. - general/linux/SuSE security discussion. All SuSE security announcements are sent to this list. To subscribe, send an email to . This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. - SuSE's announce-only mailing list. Only SuSE's security annoucements are sent to this list. To subscribe, send an email to . For general information or the frequently asked questions (faq) send mail to: or respectively. ================================================== SuSE's security contact is . The public key is listed below. ==================================================______________________________________________________________________________ The information in this advisory may be distributed or reproduced, provided that the advisory is not modified in any way. In particular, it is desired that the cleartext signature shows proof of the authenticity of the text. SuSE GmbH makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever with respect to the information contained in this security advisory. Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 2048R/3D25D3D9 1999-03-06 SuSE Security Team pub 1024D/9C800ACA 2000-10-19 SuSE Package Signing Key -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see The GNU Privacy Guard mQENAzbhLQQAAAEIAKAkXHe0lWRBXLpn38hMHy03F0I4Sszmoc8aaKJrhfhyMlOA BqvklPLE2f9UrI4Xc860gH79ZREwAgPt0pi6+SleNFLNcNFAuuHMLQOOsaMFatbz JR9i4m/lf6q929YROu5zB48rBAlcfTm+IBbijaEdnqpwGib45wE/Cfy6FAttBHQh 1Kp+r/jPbf1mYAvljUfHKuvbg8t2EIQz/5yGp+n5trn9pElfQO2cRBq8LFpf1l+U P7EKjFmlOq+Gs/fF98/dP3DfniSd78LQPq5vp8RL8nr/o2i7jkAQ33m4f1wOBWd+ cZovrKXYlXiR+Bf7m2hpZo+/sAzhd7LmAD0l09kABRG0JVN1U0UgU2VjdXJpdHkg VGVhbSA8c2VjdXJpdHlAc3VzZS5kZT6JARUDBRA24S1H5Fiyh7HKPEUBAVcOB/9b yHYji1/+4Xc2GhvXK0FSJN0MGgeXgW47yxDL7gmR4mNgjlIOUHZj0PEpVjWepOJ7 tQS3L9oP6cpj1Fj/XxuLbkp5VCQ61hpt54coQAvYrnT9rtWEGN+xmwejT1WmYmDJ xG+EGBXKr+XP69oIUl1E2JO3rXeklulgjqRKos4cdXKgyjWZ7CP9V9daRXDtje63 Om8gwSdU/nCvhdRIWp/Vwbf7Ia8iZr9OJ5YuQl0DBG4qmGDDrvImgPAFkYFzwlqo choXFQ9y0YVCV41DnR+GYhwl2qBd81T8aXhihEGPIgaw3g8gd8B5o6mPVgl+nJqI BkEYGBusiag2pS6qwznZiQEVAwUQNuEtBHey5gA9JdPZAQFtOAf+KVh939b0J94u v/kpg4xs1LthlhquhbHcKNoVTNspugiC3qMPyvSX4XcBr2PC0cVkS4Z9PY9iCfT+ x9WM96g39dAF+le2CCx7XISk9XXJ4ApEy5g4AuK7NYgAJd39PPbERgWnxjxir9g0 Ix30dS30bW39D+3NPU5Ho9TD/B7UDFvYT5AWHl3MGwo3a1RhTs6sfgL7yQ3U+mvq MkTExZb5mfN1FeaYKMopoI4VpzNVeGxQWIz67VjJHVyUlF20ekOz4kWVgsxkc8G2 saqZd6yv2EwqYTi8BDAduweP33KrQc4KDDommQNDOXxaKOeCoESIdM4p7Esdjq1o L0oixF12CohGBBARAgAGBQI7HmHDAAoJEJ5A4xAACqukTlQAoI4QzP9yjPohY7OU F7J3eKBTzp25AJ42BmtSd3pvm5ldmognWF3Trhp+GZkBogQ57vSBEQQAk/GN+ftr 7+DBlSoixDDpfRnUk+jApGEt8hCnrnjVnPs/9Cr33+CXLQbILOO7Y5oiPbJdHh45 t4E0fKyLVzDerCRFB1swz/mNDxT26DLysdBV5fwNHTPhxa67goAZVrehQPqJEckk IpYriOaYcKpF3n5fQIZMEfMaHEElQhcXML8AoJVXDkJYh7vI8EUB8ZURNLZMEECN A/sH0MCnb4Q6ZcRyeZ3+1PHP8hP73b6TepRdLZhaylwVF/iu7uIn62ZUL4//NTOC DY7V63qg4iba/fUbOsWtEnGaiE7mQuAlsSWvRspwRA9/g9rdVf3/JdLJrLmKBThe yG+PSJE3W7cAE4ZWafGxIRCwXhmj3TQnJn2euqylHRubEQP/aL53NZK0kBdvrKgf f6O8Of6tqoss8Dkk55I7QVFSp+My1Dn+mngQKFejTAgtyo/WmR3wPjQ9HoT2lRiY I2lTRYT4uMdHuwVC3b4DqAKmoy375FERwHkrMVyKBJslv8QtbAWw5A1CAUseaHo+ 91wmYJ4/4p6YUahqbG/tZyhbxfq0KFN1U0UgUGFja2FnZSBTaWduaW5nIEtleSA8 YnVpbGRAc3VzZS5kZT6IXAQTEQIAHAUCOe70gQUJA8JnAAQLCgMEAxUDAgMWAgEC F4AACgkQqE7a6JyACspfLACffAYA+NM8NBhyRyH+nTX58CNjwLIAoIx9fj52BJe0 xY7WbKoXs1+72b2AiEYEEBECAAYFAjpwXlIACgkQnkDjEAAKq6TczgCgi+ddhWb7 +FWcfeE6WwPZccqAHowAnjjtRyGwHLQHr5OTFAYTXi2Wv6jNiQEVAwUQOnBgb3ey 5gA9JdPZAQE1pwf/QJ+b34lFBNVUJ7fk/xGJJREt7V12iSafaRzGuH8xWvIz1bb+ VARxnnt16FDQ1cDNjoEhCEmcW83Vxp6iJXE9PE8wVA/Yue/bon5JS7J69+UiQ2eq 2pudfwljp52lYVM53jgPYEz0q/v3091nlZ8CYkAkN9JDS1lV1gEzJ7J0+POngDpU +lDQT2EC6VKaxeWK8pNt6UFDwICRDQxKnlOoiDvTrdWT7QdJZ4sPv8Qotdw9+tKN bWQ2DqdIRxyTdw9xDfAtcj6mXeQr7852Lwem1gSKVnEYHZ9g1FTJqVOutY8KhpUc 9RfOCRv8XuIxrs4KSbfSF0s8qIRCQelxufg9AbkCDQQ57vSSEAgAhJHQTejMX+Vr 6g1pHDEcusJ63fQ2CfFFE5iE9okH9O7UVCiSfb9CV38dmeHdPCEEjDUWquFYEnvj 3WICMtH249t1Ymuf4Du3yRKQ9oXdn/qTJzlrx9qzjiG3mH7ocwHOgUIwCrZoEdBE VE2n0zPVm+hddwjWWTWXw6pxQz+i9dsN89xexRV5M9O0bNwCLaNWX2GXeLAkqTK/ 9EuZy6x2yLxi6du9YYUAXkZpqBhCjtiUXpRoFCdglMznbcAyCk9C2wqb2j/D1Z2B eSBaGCSFkR6pRLebnE17LWcu72Iy+r0z+JecbPiyDpDZj4apn7IC81aNFGi7fNIT sHODbwwjiwADBgf/YPvVdzkc8OC7ztacEWCanwylKvxCdKzTDA+DfES6WUYShyiV JvZzRy25LJ5WcK20kzOS6Qv1OrIXiz/pdGy1aKtJZrAnFEsofpmOj8VoqyyFgp/y AGQBp12+mXek7SCZRhuqalDfEMRiWEJ6J5dLkyShyRDWyPbFh0HXE7QTHN+IKKxx QqNQXL6Z3NSxS61p+5n6BseiDUI39xxkKTFwFrkgUIc5Gs2Or2lhaWvGwSfoCmwb sklszZt6xbU+R0SjFqTvjPWx6eHfqbmNC9WMDdTjGrXDDKXFp2aYlokfN6It9vsb VlGNlOwHt/JjGoPMxW6Xqj0FLA7/VewgCdXW64hMBBgRAgAMBQI57vSSBQkDwmcA AAoJEKhO2uicgArKSyIAmwUHf/vtKQfcmVg4asR7U6XQl0bAAJ4pO22B5U8UH6IY l2LBCXFqw5+5fA==Jnnf -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- . The latest SuSE Security Bulletin concerning xmcd details a vulnerability that may lead to local privilege escalation and offers recommendations to mitigate the potential risks.. setuid,Hacking,Audio Player,Linux Vulnerabilities,SuSE Security. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 03, 2001 Critical SuSE
87

Debian: Moderate xmcd Buffer Overflow Advisory - Root Exploit Mitigated

A buffer overflow in ncurses, linked to the "cda" binary, allowed a rootexploit. The problem is fixed in xmcd 2.5pl1-7.1.. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Debian -- Security Information Daniel Jacobowitz November 21, 2000 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package: xmcd Vulnerability: untrustworthy privileged binaries Debian-specific: yes Vulnerable: yes The Debian GNU/Linux xmcd package has historically installed two setuid helpers for accessing cddb databases and SCSI cdrom drives. More recently, the package offered the administrator the chance to remove these setuid flags, but did so incorrectly. A buffer overflow in ncurses, linked to the "cda" binary, allowed a root exploit. Fixed ncurses packages have been released, as well as fixed xmcd packages which do not install this binary with a setuid flag. The problem is fixed in xmcd 2.5pl1-7.1, and we recommend all users with xmcd installed upgrade to this release. You may need to add users of xmcd to the "audio" and "cdrom" groups in order for them to continue using xmcd. Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 alias slink - -------------------------------- Slink is no longer being supported by the Debian Security Team. We highly recommend an upgrade to the current stable release. Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (stable) alias potato - ------------------------------------------ Fixes are currently available for the Alpha, ARM, Intel ia32, Motorola 680x0, PowerPC and Sun SPARC architectures, and will be included in 2.2r2. Source archives: MD5 checksum: 88eb19b072950d0c00fadf90c46a0386 MD5 checksum: 78e6765e7bc526e200344ba400504602 MD5 checksum: 316dd535081bc714c0745217471cfd65 Alpha architecture: MD5 checksum: 4352ea9c83aae49abd985a4e5bd0f8d4 MD5 checksum: 46e713b153ee70ad284ce3dcab305b45 ARMarchitecture: MD5 checksum: ba951094501062a45098c90de62c8b0c MD5 checksum: cde12639f97883537e958c7444ad6c0b Intel ia32 architecture: MD5 checksum: 117f75f3f9f03680268fe2d12a023bab MD5 checksum: a8a318f6ecb6b38a2cb0a36d984c3ec8 Motorola 680x0 architecture: MD5 checksum: 6e724e2f9ebd0b7c5143f268d7630502 MD5 checksum: dcf12acab522d74f30ad3f5c7a4bd603 PowerPC architecture: MD5 checksum: d0ffd57cb596e93f383013fdc9607569 MD5 checksum: 132094382de56fb7087d470c052f0644 Sun Sparc architecture: MD5 checksum: 48c43a24d9c6c9ae86ffceeb6bfe0a36 MD5 checksum: 20b35079db60411b586e75a7ed196b9a Debian GNU/Linux Unstable alias woody - ------------------------------------- This version of Debian is not yet released. Fixes will be made available for Alpha, ARM, Intel ia32, Motorola 680x0, PowerPC, and SPARC in the Debian archive in the next day. The packages listed above may also be installed on unstable systems. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For apt-get: deb Debian -- Security Information stable/updates main Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Package info: `apt-cache show ' and https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages . A fix for a buffer overflow in xmcd that allowed root exploitation. Upgrade recommended for improved security.. Debian Security, Buffer Overflow, xmcd Fix, ncurses Update, Setuid Privileges. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 22, 2000 Important Debian
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200