ArchLinux: 201911-10: linux: arbitrary code execution

    Date 14 Nov 2019
    375
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    The package linux before version 5.3.9.1-1 is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution.
    Arch Linux Security Advisory ASA-201911-10
    ==========================================
    
    Severity: Critical
    Date    : 2019-11-13
    CVE-ID  : CVE-2019-17666
    Package : linux
    Type    : arbitrary code execution
    Remote  : Yes
    Link    : https://security.archlinux.org/AVG-1064
    
    Summary
    =======
    
    The package linux before version 5.3.9.1-1 is vulnerable to arbitrary
    code execution.
    
    Resolution
    ==========
    
    Upgrade to 5.3.9.1-1.
    
    # pacman -Syu "linux>=5.3.9.1-1"
    
    The problem has been fixed upstream in version 5.3.9.1.
    
    Workaround
    ==========
    
    When Wi-Fi usage is not required, disabling it mitigates the issue.
    
    Description
    ===========
    
    rtl_p2p_noa_ie in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c in the
    Linux kernel before 5.3.9, 4.19.82, 4.14.152, 4.9.199, 4.4.199 lacks a
    certain upper-bound check, leading to a buffer overflow. An attacker is
    able to trigger the overflow remotely through Wi-Fi by using a power-
    saving feature known as a Notice of Absence when the Realtek (RTLWIFI)
    driver is being used on the affected host leading to arbitrary code
    execution.
    
    Impact
    ======
    
    A remote attacker in Wi-Fi range is able to execute arbitrary code when
    the Realtek (RTLWIFI) driver is being used on the affected host.
    
    References
    ==========
    
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/16/1226
    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8c55dedb795be8ec0cf488f98c03a1c2176f7fb1
    https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2019-17666
    
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"19","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":5,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.