Debian: 'dialog' symlink attack

    Date24 Dec 2000
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    dialog previously did not create them safely which made itsusceptible to a symlink attack.
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-008-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.                         Wichert Akkerman
    December 25, 2000
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Package        : dialog
    Problem type   : insecure temporary files
    Debian-specific: no
    Matt Kraai reported that he found a problem in the way dialog
    creates lock-files: it did not create them safely which made it
    susceptible to a symlink attack.
    This has been fixed in version 0.9a-20000118-3bis.
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 alias potato
    - ---------------------------------
      Potato was released for alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc and sparc.
      Source archives:
          MD5 checksum: 78b6e69859bc18f738982d4f1bd390c7
          MD5 checksum: 9bd63778ae6f295d9c06d22ac5910b92
          MD5 checksum: ffa7381631cb24aa5d61dab7f2f1245b
      Alpha architecture:
          MD5 checksum: 57c04e1f8dec33de5dffee92d0b162cb
      ARM architecture:
          MD5 checksum: 5735033a17262209a1130459229a0982
      Intel ia32 architecture:
          MD5 checksum: f38bbfaa0076a590fe2421eb2ab68a9f
      Motorola 680x0 architecture:
          MD5 checksum: e7d0985d05a750c6550dd778ab14863e
      PowerPC architecture:
          MD5 checksum: 13033d33c56d4e18e8442cc2debaa6f8
      Sun Sparc architecture:
          MD5 checksum: c310130da0b7ba8ad8d52003db9669c3
      These files will be moved into*/binary-$arch/ soon.
    For not yet released architectures please refer to the appropriate
    directory$arch/ .
    - -- 
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.