Debian: multiple 'stunnel' vulnerabilities

    Date24 Dec 2000
    CategoryDebian
    2828
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Insecure file handling and format string bugs are present in previous versions of stunnel
    
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-009-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Wichert Akkerman
    December 25, 2000
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    Package        : stunnel
    Problem type   : insecure file handling, format string bug
    Debian-specific: no
    
    Lez discovered a format string problem in stunnel (a tool to create
    Universal SSL tunnel for other network daemons). Brian Hatch
    responded by stating he was already preparing a new release with
    multiple security fixes:
    
    1. the PRNG (pseudo-random generated) was not seeded correctly.
       This only affects operation on operating systems without a
       secure random generator (like Linux)
    2. Pid files were not created securely, making stunnel vulnerable
       to a symlink attack
    3. There was an insecure syslog() call which could be exploited if
       the user could manage to insert text into the logged text. At
       least one way to exploit this using faked identd responses was
       demonstrated by Lez.
    
    These problems have been fixed in version 3.10-0potato1.
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 alias potato
    - ---------------------------------
    
      Potato was released for alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc and sparc.
      At this moment no fix is available for arm, Once a fix for that
      architecture will become available it will be announced on
       http://security.debian.org/
    
      Source archives:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/stunnel_3.10-0potato1.diff.gz
          MD5 checksum: 60d5aa858f0a06c2d419da3cf082edfd
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/stunnel_3.10-0potato1.dsc
          MD5 checksum: 0cc18707e34df76f50ca1f8d3c4faeaa 
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/stunnel_3.10.orig.tar.gz
          MD5 checksum: eca047987da225a6e4e7bd705a81f2aa
    
      Alpha architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-alpha/stunnel_3.10-0potato1_alpha.deb
          MD5 checksum: 832ad31f899dbc655b1796b56cb98c80
    
      Intel ia32 architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/stunnel_3.10-0potato1_i386.deb
          MD5 checksum: b64009319600749c58c60d39874db79d
    
      Motorola 680x0 architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-m68k/stunnel_3.10-0potato1_m68k.deb
          MD5 checksum: 89c199d09858d14c9563522f4f6fba67
    
      PowerPC architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-powerpc/stunnel_3.10-0potato1_powerpc.deb
          MD5 checksum: cd145736ba23c54f98a41afe7bb5469f
    
      Sun Sparc architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-sparc/stunnel_3.10-0potato1_sparc.deb
          MD5 checksum: 12d12072d96e1ddc6caa50cbc179619f
    
      These files will be moved into
       ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/*/binary-$arch/ soon.
    
    For not yet released architectures please refer to the appropriate
    directory  ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/binary-$arch/ .
    
    - -- 
    
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.