Debian: DSA-2276-2: asterisk regression update

    Date 11 Jul 2011
    90
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    DSA 2276-1 for Asterisk in the oldstable distribution (lenny) introduced a functionality bug which invokes an undefined symbol. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2276-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                             Luciano Bello
    July 11, 2011                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : asterisk
    Vulnerability  : multiple denial of service
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-2529 CVE-2011-2535
    Debian Bug     : 631445 631446 631448 633481
    
    DSA 2276-1 for Asterisk in the oldstable distribution (lenny) introduced a
    functionality bug which invokes an undefined symbol.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.4.21.2~dfsg-3+lenny5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.