Debian: DSA-2276-2: asterisk regression update

    Date11 Jul 2011
    CategoryDebian
    43
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    DSA 2276-1 for Asterisk in the oldstable distribution (lenny) introduced a functionality bug which invokes an undefined symbol. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2276-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                             Luciano Bello
    July 11, 2011                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : asterisk
    Vulnerability  : multiple denial of service
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-2529 CVE-2011-2535
    Debian Bug     : 631445 631446 631448 633481
    
    DSA 2276-1 for Asterisk in the oldstable distribution (lenny) introduced a
    functionality bug which invokes an undefined symbol.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.4.21.2~dfsg-3+lenny5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.