Debian: DSA-2277-1: xml-security-c security update

    Date 10 Jul 2011
    110
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It has been discovered that xml-security-c, an implementation of the XML Digital Signature and Encryption specifications, is not properly handling RSA keys of sizes on the order of 8192 or more bits. This allows an attacker to crash applications using this functionality or potentially
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2277-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                                Nico Golde
    July 10, 2011                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : xml-security-c
    Vulnerability  : stack-based buffer overflow
    Problem type   : local/remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-2516
    Debian bug     : 632973
    
    It has been discovered that xml-security-c, an implementation of the XML
    Digital Signature and Encryption specifications, is not properly handling
    RSA keys of sizes on the order of 8192 or more bits.  This allows an
    attacker to crash applications using this functionality or potentially
    execute arbitrary code by tricking an application into verifying a signature
    created with a sufficiently long RSA key.
    
    
    For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.4.0-3+lenny3.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.1-3+squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.6.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your xml-security-c packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.