Debian: DSA-2697-1: gnutls26 security update

    Date 29 May 2013
    123
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that a malicious client could crash a GNUTLS server and vice versa, by sending TLS records encrypted with a block cipher which contain invalid padding.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2697-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    May 29, 2013                           https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : gnutls26
    Vulnerability  : out-of-bounds array read
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-2116
    Debian Bug     : 709301
    
    It was discovered that a malicious client could crash a GNUTLS server
    and vice versa, by sending TLS records encrypted with a block cipher
    which contain invalid padding.
    
    The oldstable distribution (squeeze) is not affected because the
    security fix that introduced this vulnerability was not applied to it.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.12.20-7.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.12.23-5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your gnutls26 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":100,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"2","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.