Debian: DSA-2800-1: nss security update

    Date25 Nov 2013
    CategoryDebian
    44
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Andrew Tinits reported a potentially exploitable buffer overflow in the Mozilla Network Security Service library (nss). With a specially crafted request a remote attacker could cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2800-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
    November 25, 2013                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : nss
    Vulnerability  : buffer overflow
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-5605
    
    Andrew Tinits reported a potentially exploitable buffer overflow in the
    Mozilla Network Security Service library (nss). With a specially crafted
    request a remote attacker could cause a denial of service or possibly
    execute arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.12.8-1+squeeze7.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:3.14.5-1.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:3.15.3-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:3.15.3-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your nss packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.