Debian: DSA-2803-1: quagga security update

    Date26 Nov 2013
    CategoryDebian
    47
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Quagga, a BGP/OSPF/RIP routing daemon: CVE-2013-2236
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2803-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 26, 2013                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : quagga
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-2236 CVE-2013-6051
    Debian Bug     : 730513 726724
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Quagga, a BGP/OSPF/RIP 
    routing daemon:
    
    CVE-2013-2236
    
        A buffer overflow was found in the OSPF API-server (exporting the LSDB 
        and allowing announcement of Opaque-LSAs).
    
    CVE-2013-6051
    
        bgpd could be crashed through BGP updates. This only affects Wheezy/stable.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.99.20.1-0+squeeze5.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.99.22.4-1+wheezy1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.99.22.4-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your quagga packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.