Debian: DSA-3123-1: binutils security update

    Date 09 Jan 2015
    90
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in binutils, a toolbox for binary file manipulation. These vulnerabilities include multiple memory safety errors, buffer overflows, use-after-frees and other implementation errors
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3123-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                             Luciano Bello
    January 09, 2015                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : binutils
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-8484 CVE-2014-8485 CVE-2014-8501 CVE-2014-8502 
                     CVE-2014-8503 CVE-2014-8504 CVE-2014-8737 CVE-2014-8738
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in binutils, a toolbox for 
    binary file manipulation. These vulnerabilities include multiple memory 
    safety errors, buffer overflows, use-after-frees and other implementation 
    errors
    may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, the bypass of security
    restrictions, path traversal attack or denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.22-8+deb7u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.25-3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your binutils packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.