Debian: DSA-3565-2: monotone ovito pdns qtcreator softhsm regression update

    Date11 May 2016
    CategoryDebian
    70
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This updates fixes a regression introduced in botan1.10 by DSA-3565-1: packages depending on libbotan1.10 needed to be rebuilt against the latest version to function properly.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3565-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    May 11, 2016                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : monotone ovito pdns qtcreator softhsm
    Debian Bug     : 823823
    
    This updates fixes a regression introduced in botan1.10 by DSA-3565-1:
    packages depending on libbotan1.10 needed to be rebuilt against the
    latest version to function properly.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    the following versions:
    
      monotone  : 1.1-4+deb8u1
      ovito	    : 2.3.3-3+deb8u1
      pdns	    : 3.4.1-4+deb8u5
      qtcreator : 3.2.1+dfsg-7+deb8u1
      softhsm   : 1.3.7-2+deb8u1
    
    We recommend that you upgrade those packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.