Debian: DSA-3574-1: libarchive security update

    Date10 May 2016
    CategoryDebian
    54
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Rock Stevens, Andrew Ruef and Marcin 'Icewall' Noga discovered a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the zip_read_mac_metadata function in libarchive, a multi-format archive and compression library, which may lead to the execution of arbitrary code if a user or automated
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3574-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    May 10, 2016                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libarchive
    CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1541
    Debian Bug     : 823893
    
    Rock Stevens, Andrew Ruef and Marcin 'Icewall' Noga discovered a
    heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the zip_read_mac_metadata
    function in libarchive, a multi-format archive and compression library,
    which may lead to the execution of arbitrary code if a user or automated
    system is tricked into processing a specially crafted ZIP file.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.1.2-11+deb8u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libarchive packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.68,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.