Debian: DSA-4169-1: pcs security update

    Date11 Apr 2018
    CategoryDebian
    710
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Cédric Buissart from Red Hat discovered an information disclosure bug in pcs, a pacemaker command line interface and GUI. The REST interface normally doesn't allow passing --debug parameter to prevent information leak, but the check wasn't sufficient.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4169-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                        Yves-Alexis Perez
    April 11, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pcs
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-1086
    Debian Bug     : 895313
    
    Cédric Buissart from Red Hat discovered an information disclosure bug in pcs, a
    pacemaker command line interface and GUI. The REST interface normally doesn't
    allow passing --debug parameter to prevent information leak, but the check
    wasn't sufficient.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.9.155+dfsg-2+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pcs packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of pcs please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pcs
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.