Debian: DSA-4063-1: pdns-recursor security update

    Date11 Dec 2017
    CategoryDebian
    1103
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Toshifumi Sakaguchi discovered that PowerDNS Recursor, a high-performance resolving name server was susceptible to denial of service via a crafted CNAME answer.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4063-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 11, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pdns-recursor
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15120
    
    Toshifumi Sakaguchi discovered that PowerDNS Recursor, a high-performance
    resolving name server was susceptible to denial of service via a crafted
    CNAME answer.
    
    The oldstable distribution (jessie) is not affected.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.0.4-1+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pdns-recursor packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of pdns-recursor please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pdns-recursor
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.