Debian: DSA-4063-1: pdns-recursor security update

    Date 11 Dec 2017
    1205
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Toshifumi Sakaguchi discovered that PowerDNS Recursor, a high-performance resolving name server was susceptible to denial of service via a crafted CNAME answer.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4063-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 11, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pdns-recursor
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15120
    
    Toshifumi Sakaguchi discovered that PowerDNS Recursor, a high-performance
    resolving name server was susceptible to denial of service via a crafted
    CNAME answer.
    
    The oldstable distribution (jessie) is not affected.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.0.4-1+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pdns-recursor packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of pdns-recursor please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pdns-recursor
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.