Debian: DSA-4079-2: poppler regression update

    Date12 Apr 2018
    CategoryDebian
    1758
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    It was discovered that the poppler upload for the oldstable distribution (jessie), released as DSA-4079-1, did not correctly address CVE-2017-9776 and additionally caused regressions when rendering PDFs embedding JBIG2 streams. Updated packages are now available to correct
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4079-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    April 12, 2018                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : poppler
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-9776
    Debian Bug     : 890826
    
    It was discovered that the poppler upload for the oldstable distribution
    (jessie), released as DSA-4079-1, did not correctly address
    CVE-2017-9776 and additionally caused regressions when rendering PDFs
    embedding JBIG2 streams. Updated packages are now available to correct
    this issue.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 0.26.5-2+deb8u4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your poppler packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of poppler please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/poppler
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.2,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":31.71,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.