Fedora Core 2 Update: xpdf-3.00-3.7

    Date20 Jan 2005
    CategoryFedora
    6802
    Posted ByJoe Shakespeare
    Applied patch to fix CAN-2005-0064 (bug #145050)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2005-051
    2005-01-20
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Product     : Fedora Core 2
    Name        : xpdf
    Version     : 3.00
    Release     : 3.7
    Summary     : A PDF file viewer for the X Window System.
    Description :
    Xpdf is an X Window System based viewer for Portable Document Format
    (PDF) files. Xpdf is a small and efficient program which uses
    standard X fonts.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Thu Jan 20 2005 Than Ngo  1:3.00-3.7
    
    - Applied patch to fix CAN-2005-0064 (bug #145050)
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    This update can be downloaded from:
      http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/2/
    
    fc6e63d42dec1b04acb7b652a3c9262e  SRPMS/xpdf-3.00-3.7.src.rpm
    4bcdc0f9d5dcdd98a5a80a4eabddd58e  x86_64/xpdf-3.00-3.7.x86_64.rpm
    896e7b3a6bcbe0755bfbf9df982ce17d  
    x86_64/debug/xpdf-debuginfo-3.00-3.7.x86_64.rpm
    06341e3ebf8e306e27f6d0f21ad41512  i386/xpdf-3.00-3.7.i386.rpm
    2245f877aa834f77f80aaa90a1a5c596  
    i386/debug/xpdf-debuginfo-3.00-3.7.i386.rpm
    
    This update can also be installed with the Update Agent; you can
    launch the Update Agent with the 'up2date' command.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    --
    fedora-announce-list mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.