Fedora Core 3 Update: xpdf-3.00-10.2

    Date20 Jan 2005
    CategoryFedora
    6664
    Posted ByJoe Shakespeare
    Applied patch to fix CAN-2005-0064 (bug #145050)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2005-052
    2005-01-20
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Product     : Fedora Core 3
    Name        : xpdf
    Version     : 3.00
    Release     : 10.2
    Summary     : A PDF file viewer for the X Window System.
    Description :
    Xpdf is an X Window System based viewer for Portable Document Format
    (PDF) files. Xpdf is a small and efficient program which uses
    standard X fonts.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Thu Jan 20 2005 Than Ngo  1:3.00-10.2
    
    - Applied patch to fix CAN-2005-0064 (bug #145050)
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    This update can be downloaded from:
      http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/
    
    f48f1d6155d5df7fe373b16b6c7f483b  SRPMS/xpdf-3.00-10.2.src.rpm
    f2be4ca3893763c8ca6e70b11837624f  x86_64/xpdf-3.00-10.2.x86_64.rpm
    e1e769c2b742855f452982713a0b27b8  
    x86_64/debug/xpdf-debuginfo-3.00-10.2.x86_64.rpm
    3084572feb648216352553b3fed92de7  i386/xpdf-3.00-10.2.i386.rpm
    a5ad2fe0ac420e82c2e1da846805e5d6  
    i386/debug/xpdf-debuginfo-3.00-10.2.i386.rpm
    
    This update can also be installed with the Update Agent; you can
    launch the Update Agent with the 'up2date' command.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    --
    fedora-announce-list mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.