RedHat: RHSA-2019-3201:01 Important: Ansible security update

    Date24 Oct 2019
    CategoryRed Hat
    454
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update is now available for Ansible Engine 2.6. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    =====================================================================
                       Red Hat Security Advisory
    
    Synopsis:          Important: Ansible security update
    Advisory ID:       RHSA-2019:3201-01
    Product:           Red Hat Ansible Engine
    Advisory URL:      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3201
    Issue date:        2019-10-24
    CVE Names:         CVE-2019-14846 CVE-2019-14856 CVE-2019-14858 
    =====================================================================
    
    1. Summary:
    
    An update is now available for Ansible Engine 2.6.
    
    Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact
    of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score,
    which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability
    from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
    
    2. Relevant releases/architectures:
    
    Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.6 for RHEL 7 Server - noarch
    
    3. Description:
    
    Ansible is a simple model-driven configuration management, multi-node
    deployment, and remote-task execution system. Ansible works over SSH and
    does not require any software or daemons to be installed on remote nodes.
    Extension modules can be written in any language and are transferred to
    managed machines automatically.
    
    The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version:
    ansible (2.6.20)
    
    Bug Fix(es):
    * ansible: Incomplete fix for CVE-2019-10206 (CVE-2019-14856)
    * ansible: sub parameters marked as no_log are not masked in certain
    failure scenarios (CVE-2019-14858)
    * ansible: secrets disclosed on logs when no_log enabled (CVE-2019-14846)
    
    See:
    https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.6.20/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.6.r
    st for details on bug fixes in this release.
    
    4. Solution:
    
    For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes
    described in this advisory, refer to:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    
    5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/):
    
    1755373 - CVE-2019-14846 ansible: secrets disclosed on logs when no_log enabled
    1760593 - CVE-2019-14858 ansible: sub parameters marked as no_log are not masked in certain failure scenarios
    1760829 - CVE-2019-14856 ansible: Incomplete fix for CVE-2019-10206
    
    6. Package List:
    
    Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.6 for RHEL 7 Server:
    
    Source:
    ansible-2.6.20-1.el7ae.src.rpm
    
    noarch:
    ansible-2.6.20-1.el7ae.noarch.rpm
    
    These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security.  Our key and
    details on how to verify the signature are available from
    https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/
    
    7. References:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14846
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14856
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14858
    https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important
    https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.6.20/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.6.rst
    
    8. Contact:
    
    The Red Hat security contact is . More contact
    details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/
    
    Copyright 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1
    
    iQIVAwUBXbGgz9zjgjWX9erEAQiu8A/8Cmgt32XsVnDvg0UIrS/3uUDuqlwpP5/l
    7kDbhH4YvmGhZdDlHrDyuiVCtZZQTc5zEn3ggAlgqvPUx1shA2jNTOpOIBkBh4KZ
    Bgk6kOVipDR3h2YY19Bf8tWpxmGk9AsAb5zlUZ8XAf1AtFAUe2xS+o1vTj4tfW6i
    Q8FWm11tKg3ieObj7LNfJdcueGMCnjZce5MOd9CpnxMAzwWt2Tytb8XuPGfDpWBp
    sn6Dz0ERXA+eR9aJBGk7WFS6QEeRXUXHjFWLIo8iYxbmXGSMdfOA1A5lNh7OYorP
    p4VuPIYI6h+RIB1EAxt+GU9b4AWsxhlqKpEOCJn+kqqsTOC+Uv0eFui1E/shLTB4
    zWo9yE75RhdrEAgBsjFs5DPQNWWHg1mYIeXGsjX1JfOPGIjfeIv/5LYlUrOJUzgB
    3N8k+7h+xJM79DTfZEigAzCqEOLmk9JqPFY9aKVHNS2iQuI5hRPmiyDMpmDWSGlV
    n5Pm7DhmU91ixtqYXPLT/lkgCaZE5+Bu3i/lo/GhONw+UylWTNF4Ql4fEQXso3g/
    RqP6VEDSUoTHkBn9YelFYpmSZ3Ug5c+/pH/3jGLMIfcEI0MIkvJ8JocBr4yvEKRi
    jg3cVktxnEux4IM1XWr9YGLHdyDemlwJ7bzTlVlpJaot+wGuPun7REMMfXlm3p7O
    IKZ3+hMhIQ0=
    =6q1d
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    --
    RHSA-announce mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"66","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.57,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.