RedHat: RHSA-2019-3202:01 Important: Ansible security and bug fix update

    Date24 Oct 2019
    CategoryRed Hat
    485
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update is now available for Ansible Engine 2.7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    =====================================================================
                       Red Hat Security Advisory
    
    Synopsis:          Important: Ansible security and bug fix update
    Advisory ID:       RHSA-2019:3202-01
    Product:           Red Hat Ansible Engine
    Advisory URL:      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3202
    Issue date:        2019-10-24
    CVE Names:         CVE-2019-14846 CVE-2019-14856 CVE-2019-14858 
    =====================================================================
    
    1. Summary:
    
    An update is now available for Ansible Engine 2.7.
    
    Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact
    of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score,
    which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability
    from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
    
    2. Relevant releases/architectures:
    
    Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.7 for RHEL 7 Server - noarch
    
    3. Description:
    
    Ansible is a simple model-driven configuration management, multi-node
    deployment, and remote-task execution system. Ansible works over SSH and
    does not require any software or daemons to be installed on remote nodes.
    Extension modules can be written in any language and are transferred to
    managed machines automatically.
    
    The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version:
    ansible (2.7.14)
    
    Bug Fix(es):
    * ansible: Incomplete fix for CVE-2019-10206 (CVE-2019-14856)
    * ansible: sub parameters marked as no_log are not masked in certain
    failure scenarios (CVE-2019-14858)
    * ansible: secrets disclosed on logs when no_log enabled (CVE-2019-14846)
    
    See:
    https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.7.14/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.7.r
    st
    for details on bug fixes in this release.
    
    4. Solution:
    
    For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes
    described in this advisory, refer to:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    
    5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/):
    
    1755373 - CVE-2019-14846 ansible: secrets disclosed on logs when no_log enabled
    1760593 - CVE-2019-14858 ansible: sub parameters marked as no_log are not masked in certain failure scenarios
    1760829 - CVE-2019-14856 ansible: Incomplete fix for CVE-2019-10206
    
    6. Package List:
    
    Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.7 for RHEL 7 Server:
    
    Source:
    ansible-2.7.14-1.el7ae.src.rpm
    
    noarch:
    ansible-2.7.14-1.el7ae.noarch.rpm
    
    These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security.  Our key and
    details on how to verify the signature are available from
    https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/
    
    7. References:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14846
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14856
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14858
    https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important
    https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.7.14/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.7.rst
    
    8. Contact:
    
    The Red Hat security contact is . More contact
    details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/
    
    Copyright 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1
    
    iQIVAwUBXbGg2dzjgjWX9erEAQh6uQ//Zefnv6mrL6qzQSb9/3EYXmWtXUlgvBGm
    IiBCYDOZhQgXVyhElOxfMzrsbIO4oH0zh0gI/udLK1bZSXiO4T2eMrhuwPBjMkUg
    K4eBEnvmGSSGiQMnSNUurTOv9AMziv/bHMkACVd2u06JLoQnUp2FnjZcIofQRiPN
    r1/dUpD3Sv3GfGBkRY3XI0HbI8sZ7dFZK2VLdoFSecH4gF8W/LuXPtJEvDV/LIPd
    F5VfRtoFfuYrMa6NT5kAuI4nClSZivw/s9bNQZcNHIh3hh5PRihDbTzsehU0Qwxl
    YoQPMOOdzWlg6v/qno7MFiUb9mfxBF7XgI2qusCwAxHtOT5GcqJ8jQ4WwwdW2I5P
    mgedYCxuOwvWUs1FBr2/7qN7O+ZGdMDCxiDvdu26Oek1d7zenYZ1j1CClIfYta5y
    O8GXuXwSWe5dWdZ/em+WOQn7Zw6HaMBNOc5YG+jFJ0Ulw4vN6tEPgOQx3CrayLvL
    o1/ygw+88ENTfF3uL6TcWyYfBMEI1T5YIlvD0uKzaJcjA+HNXYZgPz2OB5FSMUG2
    m0Qk+fpMhDsBTCPwbsqETQBrXN4hzvTnOiDSFAWsSk6E1a9eAWyivKrD21pRvYdw
    YvvTm5bKyGjR1Spyp2kYAB3FHrzRoMg6sOjhKF52ROsJxEBTpDBQqxf5UYdV//Qa
    +8JVEGR7+pg=
    =6Ghu
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    --
    RHSA-announce mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"66","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.57,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.