Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 521
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 521

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Ignition Important Fix for CVE-2026-39821 Buffer Overflow

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Kernel RT Important Fix for Six Issues Vuln 2026-3316-1

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux Grafana Important Security Fix RLSA-2026-46391 CVE-2026-44740

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H800
Rocky

Rocky Linux Libreswan Important DoS Issues RLSA-2026-46396

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Debianlts Large Esm H900
Debian LTS

Debian 11 OpenJDK 11 Major Threats Fixed DLA-4702-1 CVE-2026-41254

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 20.04 Linux Kernel Alert USN-8620-1 CVE-2023-45896 High Risk

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H800
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 22.04 Linux Kernel Critical Privilege Escalation Vulnern 2025-8619-1

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 24.04 AWS Kernel Important Security Issues Fix USN-8595-3

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu Kernel USN-8574-3 Multiple Security Flaws Affecting System Integrity

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -7 articles for you...
100
Ls Advisories Suse Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorymoderateSuSE

SUSE 15 SP7: 2025:02188-1 moderate: ImageMagick mishandling

* bsc#1241658 * bsc#1241659 * bsc#1243622 Cross-References: . # Security update for ImageMagick Announcement ID: SUSE-SU-2025:02188-1 Release Date: 2025-07-01T11:48:32Z Rating: moderate References: * bsc#1241658 * bsc#1241659 * bsc#1243622 Cross-References: * CVE-2025-43965 * CVE-2025-46393 CVSS scores: * CVE-2025-43965 ( SUSE ): 5.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N * CVE-2025-43965 ( SUSE ): 5.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L * CVE-2025-43965 ( NVD ): 2.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L * CVE-2025-46393 ( SUSE ): 5.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N * CVE-2025-46393 ( SUSE ): 5.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L * CVE-2025-46393 ( NVD ): 2.9 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L Affected Products: * Desktop Applications Module 15-SP7 * Development Tools Module 15-SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 An update that solves two vulnerabilities and has one security fix can now be installed. ## Description: This update for ImageMagick fixes the following issues: Security issues fixed: * CVE-2025-43965: mishandling of image depth after SetQuantumFormat is used in MIFF image processing (bsc#1241659). * CVE-2025-46393: mishandling of packet_size and rendering of channels in arbitrary order in multispectral MIFF image processing (bsc#1241658). Other issues fixed: * Restore SUSE specific hardening config policies that got lost in refactoring (bsc#1243622). ## Patch Instructions: To install this SUSE update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch". Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product: * Desktop Applications Module 15-SP7 zypper in -t patchSUSE-SLE-Module-Desktop-Applications-15-SP7-2025-2188=1 * Development Tools Module 15-SP7 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Development-Tools-15-SP7-2025-2188=1 ## Package List: * Desktop Applications Module 15-SP7 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) * libMagick++-devel-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagickWand-7_Q16HDRI10-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagick++-7_Q16HDRI5-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-debugsource-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagickCore-7_Q16HDRI10-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagickCore-7_Q16HDRI10-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-config-7-upstream-secure-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagick++-7_Q16HDRI5-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-config-7-upstream-websafe-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-config-7-upstream-limited-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * libMagickWand-7_Q16HDRI10-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-config-7-upstream-open-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-devel-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-config-7-SUSE-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * Development Tools Module 15-SP7 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64) * ImageMagick-debugsource-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * perl-PerlMagick-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * perl-PerlMagick-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 * ImageMagick-debuginfo-7.1.1.43-150700.3.3.1 ## References: * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-43965.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-46393.html * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241658 * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241659 * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243622 . ImageMagick security update resolves important issues including mishandling of image depth and channels.. ImageMagick update,SUSE patches,security issues,ImageMagick vulnerabilities. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jul 01, 2025 SuSE
89
Ls Advisories Fedora Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorycriticalFedora

Fedora 38: FEDORA-2023-8334fe0ecb Critical: Xen SSBD Handling Issue

Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware [XSA-431, CVE-2022-42336]. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2023-8334fe0ecb 2023-05-27 01:17:05.076788 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Name : xen Product : Fedora 38 Version : 4.17.1 Release : 2.fc38 URL : https://xenproject.org/ Summary : Xen is a virtual machine monitor Description : This package contains the XenD daemon and xm command line tools, needed to manage virtual machines running under the Xen hypervisor --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Update Information: Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware [XSA-431, CVE-2022-42336] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ChangeLog: * Tue May 16 2023 Michael Young - 4.17.1-2 - Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware [XSA-431, CVE-2022-42336] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------References: [ 1 ] Bug #2208357 - CVE-2022-42336 xen: Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208357 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2023-8334fe0ecb' at the command line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/security/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. To unsubscribe send anemail to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it./ Do not reply to spam, report it: . Fedora 38 patch addresses SSBD issues on AMD platforms, bolstering security for virtual machine oversight.. Fedora 38 Update, Xen Hypervisor, Security Fixes. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 27, 2023 •Critical Fedora
Banner 2 1028x280 1708121730 1 1771599631
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics