Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 518
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 518

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Rockylinux Esm H800
Rocky

Rocky Linux Grafana Important Security Fix RLSA-2026-46391 CVE-2026-44740

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Rockylinux Esm H900
Rocky

Rocky Linux Libreswan Important DoS Issues RLSA-2026-46396

Calendar White Jul 28, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 20.04 Linux Kernel Alert USN-8620-1 CVE-2023-45896 High Risk

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H800
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 22.04 Linux Kernel Critical Privilege Escalation Vulnern 2025-8619-1

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 24.04 AWS Kernel Important Security Issues Fix USN-8595-3

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu Kernel USN-8574-3 Multiple Security Flaws Affecting System Integrity

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H800
Ubuntu

Ubuntu Linux Kernel Security Issues Severity Important USN-8570-2

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Ubuntu Large Esm H900
Ubuntu

Ubuntu 26.04 Kernel Update Privilege Escalation USN-8618-1 CVE-2025-54518

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Critical
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia SQLite Moderate NULL Pointer Denial of Service 2026-0305

Calendar White Jul 27, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
100
Ls Advisories Suse Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorysecurity issueSUSE

SUSE: 2024:1990-1 Important: Fix Out Of Bounds And Pointer Issues

* bsc#1223356 Cross-References: * CVE-2024-0090 * CVE-2024-0091 . # Security update for kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06, nvidia-open- driver-G06-signed Announcement ID: SUSE-SU-2024:1990-1 Rating: important References: * bsc#1223356 Cross-References: * CVE-2024-0090 * CVE-2024-0091 * CVE-2024-0092 CVSS scores: * CVE-2024-0090 ( SUSE ): 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H * CVE-2024-0091 ( SUSE ): 7.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H * CVE-2024-0092 ( SUSE ): 5.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Affected Products: * Basesystem Module 15-SP5 * openSUSE Leap 15.5 * Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 An update that solves three vulnerabilities can now be installed. ## Description: This update for kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06, nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed fixes the following issues: Security Update 550.90.07: * CVE-2024-0090: Fixed out of bounds write (bsc#1223356). * CVE-2024-0092: Fixed incorrect exception handling (bsc#1223356). * CVE-2024-0091: Fixed untrusted pointer dereference (bsc#1223356). ## Patch Instructions: To install this SUSE update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch". Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product: * openSUSE Leap 15.5 zypper in -t patch SUSE-2024-1990=1 openSUSE-SLE-15.5-2024-1990=1 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Micro-5.5-2024-1990=1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP5 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Basesystem-15-SP5-2024-1990=1 * Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Public-Cloud-15-SP5-2024-1990=1 ## Package List: * openSUSE Leap 15.5 (aarch64 nosrcx86_64) * kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06-550.90.07-150500.11.29.1 * openSUSE Leap 15.5 (x86_64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-azure-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-azure-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.33.54-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-azure-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.33.54-150500.3.47.1 * openSUSE Leap 15.5 (aarch64 x86_64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-debugsource-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-default-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * openSUSE Leap 15.5 (aarch64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-64kb-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-64kb-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-64kb-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 (aarch64 nosrc x86_64) * kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06-550.90.07-150500.11.29.1 * SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 (aarch64 x86_64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP5 (aarch64 nosrc x86_64) * kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06-550.90.07-150500.11.29.1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP5 (aarch64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-64kb-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-64kb-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-64kb-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * Basesystem Module 15-SP5 (aarch64 x86_64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 *nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-debugsource-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-default-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-default-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.55.65-150500.3.47.1 * Public Cloud Module 15-SP5 (x86_64) * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-azure-devel-550.90.07-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-azure-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.33.54-150500.3.47.1 * nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed-kmp-azure-debuginfo-550.90.07_k5.14.21_150500.33.54-150500.3.47.1 ## References: * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0090.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0091.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0092.html * https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223356 . Apply critical patches for the kernel-firmware-nvidia-gspx-G06 and nvidia-open-driver-G06-signed to address potential vulnerabilities.. SUSE Linux, Nvidia Driver Security, Kernel Update, SUSE Advisory, Security Patch. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jun 11, 2024 •Important SuSE
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Are host-based firewalls still worth using?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/158-are-host-based-firewalls-still-worth-using?task=poll.vote&format=json
158
radio
0
[{"id":510,"title":"Yes \u2014 every server needs one.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":511,"title":"No \u2014 perimeter and cloud security are enough.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":512,"title":"Only Internet-facing systems really benefit.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":513,"title":"iptables.conf is my security policy.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics