Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 442
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 442

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Mageia Large Esm H800
Mageia

Mageia wget Important Denial of Service Threats and Updates 2026-0300

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Critical
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia libnfs Important Integer Overflow Vuln CVE-2026-53689 2026-0299

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Important
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia Graphite2 Important Integer Underflow Out of Bounds Vuln 2026-0298

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Important
Mageia Large Esm H800
Mageia

Mageia vorbis-tools Critical Buffer Underflow Vulnerability CVE-2026-34253

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Critical
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia 10 9 Yelp Important Content Security Issue CVE-2026-13601

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Important
Mageia Large Esm H900
Mageia

Mageia giflib Critical Denial of Service Vuln 2026-0295 CVE-2026-26740

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
Critical
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE Tumbleweed perl-HTTP-Date Moderate Threat Advisory CVE-2026-14741

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Tumbleweed proftpd Moderate Security Issue CVE-2026-42167

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
moderate
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE google-osconfig-agent Moderate Security Threat Vuln 2026-11349-1

Calendar White Jul 25, 2026
moderate
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -4 articles for you...
197
Ls Advisories Deblts Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorysecurity issueDebian

Debian 9: DLA-2989-1 Critical: Ghostscript Security Access Risk

A security vulnerability was found in Ghostscript, the GPL PostScript/PDF interpreter. It was discovered that some privileged Postscript operators remained accessible from various places. For instance a specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to have access to the file . -------------------------------------------------------------------------Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2989-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Markus Koschany May 01, 2022 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------Package : ghostscript Version : 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u9 CVE ID : CVE-2019-25059 A security vulnerability was found in Ghostscript, the GPL PostScript/PDF interpreter. It was discovered that some privileged Postscript operators remained accessible from various places. For instance a specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw in order to have access to the file system outside of the constrains imposed by -dSAFER. This problem exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-3839. For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u9. We recommend that you upgrade your ghostscript packages. For the detailed security status of ghostscript please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ghostscript Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS . A critical vulnerability in Ghostscript reveals dangerous file system access threats. Promptly update to address security concerns without delay.. Ghostscript Update, Debian LTS Security, PostScript Vulnerability. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 01, 2022 •Critical Debian LTS
87
Ls Advisories Debian Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorydebianarbitrary code

Debian: DSA-4756-1 Critical: Lilypond Arbitrary Code Execution Risk

Faidon Liambotis discovered that Lilypond, a program for typesetting sheet music, did not restrict the inclusion of Postscript and SVG commands when operating in safe mode, which could result in the execution of arbitrary code when rendering a typesheet file with . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-4756-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff August 29, 2020 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : lilypond CVE ID : CVE-2020-17353 Faidon Liambotis discovered that Lilypond, a program for typesetting sheet music, did not restrict the inclusion of Postscript and SVG commands when operating in safe mode, which could result in the execution of arbitrary code when rendering a typesheet file with embedded Postscript code. For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in version 2.19.81+really-2.18.2-13+deb10u1. We recommend that you upgrade your lilypond packages. For the detailed security status of lilypond please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/lilypond Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . The security alert DSA-5382-1 pertains to a potential arbitrary command execution vulnerability in the Gnuplot graphing utility within the Ubuntu operating system.. Lilypond Security Update, Debian Advisory DSA-4756-1, Arbitrary Code Execution. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 29, 2020 •Critical Debian
Banner 4 1028x280 1708121825 1771600306
87
Ls Advisories Debian Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorydenial of servicedebian

Debian: DSA-4372-1 Moderate: Ghostscript DoS And Code Execution Risk

Tavis Ormandy discovered a vulnerability in Ghostscript, the GPL PostScript/PDF interpreter, which may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed Postscript file is processed (despite the -dSAFER sandbox being enabled). . - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-4372-1 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso January 26, 2019 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : ghostscript CVE ID : CVE-2019-6116 Tavis Ormandy discovered a vulnerability in Ghostscript, the GPL PostScript/PDF interpreter, which may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed Postscript file is processed (despite the -dSAFER sandbox being enabled). For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in version 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1. We recommend that you upgrade your ghostscript packages. For the detailed security status of ghostscript please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ghostscript Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory. tavis, ormandy, vulnerability, ghostscript, postscript/pdf, interpreter, which. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jan 26, 2019 Debian
89
Ls Advisories Fedora Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorycritical issuefedora

Fedora 27 2018-f1b1ed38b3 Critical Ghostscript Memory Corruption

Security update for `CVE-2018-16543` and `CVE-2018-16510`, which were recently discovered.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2018-f1b1ed38b3 2018-09-17 18:52:22.487811 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Name : ghostscript Product : Fedora 27 Version : 9.22 Release : 6.fc27 URL : https://www.ghostscript.com/ Summary : A PostScript interpreter and renderer Description : Ghostscript is a set of software that provides a PostScript interpreter, a set of C procedures (the Ghostscript library, which implements the graphics capabilities in the PostScript language) and an interpreter for Portable Document Format (PDF) files. Ghostscript translates PostScript code into many common, bitmapped formats, like those understood by your printer or screen. Ghostscript is normally used to display PostScript files and to print PostScript files to non-PostScript printers. If you need to display PostScript files or print them to non-PostScript printers, you should install ghostscript. If you install ghostscript, you also need to install the urw-base35-fonts package. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Update Information: Security update for `CVE-2018-16543` and `CVE-2018-16510`, which were recently discovered. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 6 2018 David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] - 9.22-6 - Fix for CVE-2018-16510 added (bug #1625837) - Fix for CVE-2018-16543 added (bug #1625852) * Wed Aug 29 2018 David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] - 9.22-5 - ghostscript-9.22-fixes-for-set-of-CVEs-reported-by-Google.patch added - Fix for CVE-2018-10194 correctly applied * Mon Apr 23 2018 David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] - 9.22-4 - Fix for CVE-2018-10194 added (bug #1569821) * Mon Dec 4 2017 David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] - 9.22-2 - Fontmap.GS lookup path forHelvetica-Narrow-Bold-Oblique font fixed (bug #1517518) * Wed Nov 29 2017 Tom Callaway - 9.22-2 - apply post 9.22 upstream commit to restore flushpage operator (xdvi needs it) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------References: [ 1 ] Bug #1625837 - CVE-2018-16510 ghostscript: Incorrect exec stack handling in the "CS" and "SC" PDF primitives (699671) [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625837 [ 2 ] Bug #1625852 - CVE-2018-16543 ghostscript: gssetresolution and gsgetresolution memory corruption (699670) [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625852 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2018-f1b1ed38b3' at the command line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at https://fedoraproject.org/security/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it./ . The latest Debian patch resolves significant vulnerabilities in Ghostscript that impact PostScript and PDF processing.. Ghostscript Update, Fedora Security, Memory Corruption Fix, PostScript Interpreter. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Sep 17, 2018 •Critical Fedora
Banner 4 1028x280 1708121825 1771600306
98
Ls Advisories Redhat Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorycode executionsecurity fix

Red Hat Enterprise Linux: RHSA-2017-1230-01 Important Ghostscript Code Exec

An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score,. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ==================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Important: ghostscript security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2017:1230-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1230 Issue date: 2017-05-12 CVE Names: CVE-2017-8291 ==================================================================== 1. Summary: An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7) - noarch, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7) - noarch, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7) - aarch64, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7) - aarch64, noarch, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat EnterpriseLinux Workstation (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7) - noarch, x86_64 3. Description: The Ghostscript suite contains utilities for rendering PostScript and PDF documents. Ghostscript translates PostScript code to common bitmap formats so that the code can be displayed or printed. Security Fix(es): * It was found that ghostscript did not properly validate the parameterspassed to the .rsdparams and .eqproc functions. During its execution, a specially crafted PostScript document could execute code in the context of the ghostscript process, bypassing the -dSAFER protection. (CVE-2017-8291) 4. Solution: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 1446063 - CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript: corruption of operand stack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.src.rpm i386: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): i386: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v.6): Source: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.src.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.src.rpm i386: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ppc64: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm s390x: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v.6): i386: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ppc64: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.ppc64.rpm s390x: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.s390x.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.src.rpm i386: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): i386: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-doc-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-8.70-23.el6_9.2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v.7): Source: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.src.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7): noarch: ghostscript-doc-9.07-20.el7_3.5.noarch.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7): Source: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.src.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7): noarch: ghostscript-doc-9.07-20.el7_3.5.noarch.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v.7): Source: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.src.rpm aarch64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm ppc64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm s390x: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v.7): aarch64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.aarch64.rpm noarch: ghostscript-doc-9.07-20.el7_3.5.noarch.rpm ppc64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.ppc64le.rpm s390x: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.s390x.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7): Source: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.src.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-cups-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7): noarch: ghostscript-doc-9.07-20.el7_3.5.noarch.rpm x86_64: ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-debuginfo-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.i686.rpm ghostscript-devel-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm ghostscript-gtk-9.07-20.el7_3.5.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key 7. References: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-8291 https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification#important 8. Contact: The Red Hatsecurity contact is . More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact Copyright 2017 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFZFYy0XlSAg2UNWIIRAipXAJ4rcg5WDTUPj1FZHorIBKq2r8ku/wCgnP4U LZENSjSfcYRRl+hf4pfol10=6EN3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Enterprise-watch-list mailing list This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Ubuntu rolls out vital ImageMagick security patch for 18.04 and 20.04 tackling serious vulnerabilities. Update your systems immediately!. ghostscript patch, RHEL update, Linux code execution, Red Hat security. . Severity: Important. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 12, 2017 •Important Red Hat
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics