Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More

×
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 534
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 534

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is application sandboxing truly safe?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/155-is-application-sandboxing-truly-safe?task=poll.vote&format=json
155
radio
0
[{"id":500,"title":"Malware still escapes container walls.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":501,"title":"Supply chains corrupt trusted packages.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":502,"title":"Convenience consistently compromises strict security.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -1 articles for you...
79

Boost Linux Security Using These 10 Vital Testing Tools Now

Linux admins rarely deal with one fixed system anymore. A single environment may include public-facing web apps, internal services, containers, cloud workloads, code repositories, and third-party packages pulled into production. That mix creates more places for weak points to hide. . Security testing tools help admins find those weak points before they turn into outages, data leaks, or full system compromise. Some tools scan networks. Others check code, container images, web apps, or exposed credentials. Used together, they give teams a more complete view of risk across the stack. This list covers ten security testing tools Linux admins should know for network checks, web testing, vulnerability scanning, code review, and secrets detection. Mindgard AI features are starting to show up in Linux-hosted applications. Internal automation tools, customer portals, support bots. Traditional vulnerability scanners were never designed to test how machine learning systems behave when someone intentionally feeds them hostile input. That leaves a blind spot in many security testing workflows. What It Helps Test Mindgard focuses on applications that include AI components like large language models or machine learning pipelines. A standard scanner might flag outdated packages or configuration problems, but it won’t tell you what happens when a model receives a manipulated prompt or unexpected data. This becomes important when applications pass information between models, APIs, and internal services. Weak logic anywhere in that chain can introduce security issues even when the infrastructure itself is properly hardened. Where It Fits in Modern Security Workflows Mindgard works best as a specialized layer within a broader testing process. Network scanners, web testing tools, and static analyzers still cover most traditional attack surfaces. Teams evaluating different offensive security tools often notice that many focus heavily on infrastructure and application flaws. AI behaviortesting is a newer territory. Mindgard focuses on how AI-driven features interact with software systems and user input. AI features are moving into production systems quickly. Testing how they react to hostile input is becoming part of a normal security review. Nmap Understanding what is exposed on a network is the first step in securing it. Nmap remains one of the most widely used tools for mapping systems, services, and open ports across Linux environments. Network Discovery and Attack Surface Mapping Nmap scans networks to identify live hosts, open ports, and service versions. Those results often reveal risks that configuration files alone might not show. An SSH service exposed to the internet, an outdated web server, or an unexpected management port can all signal potential trouble. In long-running environments, forgotten systems and temporary services tend to accumulate. Test machines, staging containers, or misconfigured applications may remain accessible long after their intended purpose ends. Network discovery scans make those exposures visible. How It Supports Security Assessments Nmap frequently appears at the beginning of security reviews and penetration tests. It verifies what systems are actually exposed to the network instead of relying solely on documentation or firewall rules. Once reachable systems are identified, deeper vulnerability scans or manual testing can begin. That reconnaissance step usually shapes where the rest of the assessment goes. OWASP ZAP Most web application problems don’t show up in the infrastructure. They show up in the application logic. Login forms, session cookies, API parameters, and request handling. That’s where OWASP ZAP spends its time. Instead of scanning packages or configuration files, the tool sits in the traffic path and interacts with the application directly. Detecting Weak Points in Web Applications ZAP performs dynamic application security testing. It runs against a live application and observeshow requests and responses behave. During a scan, it crawls the site, maps available endpoints, and starts sending modified requests back to the server. Parameters in forms, headers, cookies, and query strings. Anything the backend might process. Problems tend to surface there: injection flaws , broken authentication logic, missing headers, and weak session handling. Those issues rarely appear in static analysis. Flexible for Manual and Automated Testing Some teams use ZAP interactively. A tester proxies traffic through it, inspects requests, and tweaks them during the session. Other environments treat it more like a pipeline step. The scanner runs during a build or staging deployment, produces a report, and the findings land alongside the rest of the testing results before the application goes live. Nikto Nikto focuses on a narrow but useful job. Quickly identifying known issues in web server configurations. Fast Checks for Web Infrastructure The scanner looks for dangerous files, outdated server components, misconfigurations, and publicly exposed paths that should not be accessible. These checks are straightforward but often reveal problems introduced during server setup or deployment. Default files left behind after installation and unpatched components are common findings. Practical Early Warning Nikto works well as an early-stage diagnostic tool. It does not replace deeper vulnerability testing, but it frequently highlights areas that deserve closer inspection. Run it after deploying a server or moving an application. Misconfigurations tend to show up quickly. OpenVAS When environments grow beyond a handful of machines, manual vulnerability reviews become difficult to maintain. OpenVAS provides a way to scan large groups of systems for known security issues. Broad Vulnerability Coverage The scanner analyzes servers, services, applications, and network devices. Results are compared against vulnerability databases to identify knownweaknesses. Automated assessments allow teams to monitor many systems at once instead of inspecting each one individually. Supporting Vulnerability Prioritization Security teams rarely have the resources to fix every issue immediately. OpenVAS organizes scan results by severity, helping teams identify which weaknesses pose the greatest risk. Internet-facing systems, outdated services, and critical vulnerabilities usually rise to the top. That short list is where patching usually starts. Trivy Modern infrastructure rarely runs as a single server anymore. Containers, dependency chains, and infrastructure templates all sit in the stack now, and each layer brings its own security problems. Trivy focuses on scanning those layers. It checks container images, operating system packages, language dependencies, and configuration files for known vulnerabilities. An image can look clean on the surface while still carrying outdated libraries or vulnerable packages pulled in through dependencies. That tends to happen quietly during builds. A base image updates, a dependency shifts version, and suddenly a container ships with software nobody reviewed closely. Trivy catches those cases before images move into production. Metasploit Framework Finding a vulnerability in a scan report does not always mean it matters. Plenty of issues look serious on paper, but go nowhere once someone actually tries to use them. Metasploit helps answer that question. Security teams use it to simulate real attack techniques against a known weakness. If an exposed service or outdated component appears during scanning, a matching module can test whether the flaw leads anywhere useful. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it fails immediately. Either outcome tells you more than the report alone. Semgrep A lot of security problems start during development. Long before anything runs in production. Semgrep looks directly at source code instead of live systems. It scans for patterns that tend tointroduce vulnerabilities. Weak input validation, unsafe functions, and credentials hardcoded into scripts. The kind of mistakes that slip through code review when teams are moving quickly. Teams usually start with default rules and then tune them for the languages and frameworks they actually use. The rule sets tend to evolve along with the codebase. SQLMap Databases sit behind a large percentage of web applications. When input handling breaks down, SQL injection is usually close behind. SQLMap automates the testing process. It probes how applications handle user input and database queries, looking for signs that injected commands can alter the query flow. If the weakness exists, the tool can push further to test whether data extraction or modification is possible. Older applications tend to expose these issues first. Legacy database logic is often where the cracks appear. Gitleaks Not every security incident begins with an exploit. Sometimes it begins with a password sitting in a repository. Gitleaks searches code repositories for secrets. API keys, tokens, certificates, and credentials are committed during development. Automation scripts and infrastructure configuration files are common sources. Once credentials land in version control, they spread quickly through forks, clones, and cached builds. The longer they sit there, the harder the cleanup becomes. Early detection keeps the damage contained. Conclusion Linux environments used to be simpler. A few servers, maybe a database, a web service in front. The stack is wider now. Networks, containers, APIs, dependency chains, CI pipelines, internal tooling. AI features are starting to appear in some platforms as well. Each layer introduces its own failure points. Security testing tools tend to focus on different slices of that surface. Nmap maps exposed services. ZAP and SQLMap focus on application behavior. OpenVAS scans the infrastructure for known vulnerabilities. Trivy checks container images anddependency layers. Gitleaks looks for credentials that leaked into repositories. Semgrep operates earlier in the pipeline, inside the code itself. Metasploit helps verify whether a vulnerability actually leads to compromise. Mindgard enters where older tools struggle. Testing how AI-enabled features behave when someone intentionally feeds them hostile input. No single tool sees everything. Most teams end up running several together just to keep visibility across the Linux security environment. . Explore top security testing tools for Linux admins to enhance security checks and identify potential risks. Stay protected!. Linux Admin Tools, Security Testing, Vulnerability Assessment, Network Security Tools, Application Security. . MaK Ulac

Calendar%202 Mar 13, 2026 User Avatar MaK Ulac Security Projects
81

Automated Spear Phishing Tool For Social Networks By Core Security

A researcher here today released a free tool that impersonates a Twitter user's account in order to execute automated targeted attacks on the person's followers. Pedro Varangot, a security researcher with Core Security Labs, says the group wrote the tool as a way to demonstrate and test for how social networks can be used for spear phishing.. The initial version executes attacks on Twitter, but Varangot says it can be extended to work against Facebook and other social networks. The tool is based on Core's Exomind, an experimental Python-based framework written to test social network, search engines, and instant messaging attacks. "We think spear phishing attacks are going to go [beyond] email because people aren't trusting email [as much] anymore," Varangot says. Social networks are already becoming a popular attack vector for spammers and worm attacks, and they make an attractive target for spear phishing, as well. The link for this article located at Dark Reading is no longer available. . An innovative platform demonstrates sophisticated assaults on social media, particularly Twitter, elevating the efficiency of spear phishing assessments.. Social Media Attacks, Phishing Tools, Security Research, Automation in Cybersecurity. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Mar 05, 2010 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
77

Procmail Email Management: Build, Configure, And Automate

In today's article, I'll build and configure procmail and get you started on a few basic recipes. In next week's article, I'll continue with some more complicated recipes and look at procmail's logging features.. . .. In today's article, I'll build and configure procmail and get you started on a few basic recipes. In next week's article, I'll continue with some more complicated recipes and look at procmail's logging features. Procmail Basics 12/06/2001 If you receive more than a few email messages a day, you've probably discovered that it becomes increasingly difficult to sort and prioritize your email. Messages you want to read immediately can get lost in a sea of less-important messages. Worse, your inbox can become cluttered with spam, virus-infected messages, and other disagreeables. Fortunately, the procmail program has been designed to help you sort through this mess. . Discover how to efficiently filter and manage emails with Procmail, from installation to creating recipes and testing configurations for optimal organization. Procmail, Email Filtering, Configuration Tutorial, Automation Tool, Email Management. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 07, 2001 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
83

Core-SDI Unveils Automated Penetration Testing Tool for Network Security

Argentinian security firm Core-SDI created a storm of controversy when it unveiled an 'intelligent' hacking tool which automates system penetration. The as yet unnamed tool, showcased at the Def Con and Black Hat conference in Las Vegas, is capable of scanning . . . . Argentinian security firm Core-SDI created a storm of controversy when it unveiled an 'intelligent' hacking tool which automates system penetration. The as yet unnamed tool, showcased at the Def Con and Black Hat conference in Las Vegas, is capable of scanning the target, mapping networks, finding vulnerabilities and scripting and compiling customised code to exploit those flaws before systematically trying to gain higher levels of access. Core-SDI boasted that before the arrival of its 'hack in a box' tool, security professionals and penetration testers had to make do with a patchwork toolbox built up of scripts pulled off the web or developed by the pen testers themselves along with commercial port scanners and a multitude of other tools. The offering would include this entire toolbox in one package, but uses agents to break further into target networks. These agents attempt to break into a certain area or machine and, once successful, would deploy another agent to run the next stage of the hack. Core-SDI claimed that the tool would be smarter than some script kiddies, pulling hacking techniques from a huge database before generating a full security report highlighting any weaknesses. The company argued - somewhat unconvincingly - that to deter script kiddies from using the tool, it was attaching a hefty price tag so that it would only fall into the hands of security professionals. It should be available by the end of the year. [ All of article ] The link for this article located at vnunet is no longer available. . The latest innovation from Core-SDI streamlines vulnerability assessments by automating penetration testing, crafting detailed security evaluations and targeting system flaws.. IntelligentHacking Tool, Core-SDI, Security Automation, Network Vulnerability, Penetration Testing. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jul 18, 2001 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Hacks/Cracks
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is application sandboxing truly safe?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/155-is-application-sandboxing-truly-safe?task=poll.vote&format=json
155
radio
0
[{"id":500,"title":"Malware still escapes container walls.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":501,"title":"Supply chains corrupt trusted packages.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":502,"title":"Convenience consistently compromises strict security.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200