The UK has banned researchers from revealing details of security vulnerabilities in car locks. In 2008, Phillips brought a similar suit against researchers who broke the Mifare chip. That time, they lost. This time, Volkswagen sued and won.. This is bad news for security researchers. (Remember back in 2001 when security researcher Ed Felten sued the RIAA in the US to be able to publish his research results?) We're not going to improve security unless we're allowed to publish our results. And we can't start suppressing scientific results, just because a big corporation doesn't like what it does to their reputation. The link for this article located at Schneier on Security is no longer available. . Prohibiting scientists from disclosing weaknesses in vehicle security systems endangers investigative studies and general awareness.. Car Security, Researcher Rights, Corporate Influence, Security Disclosure. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
For nine years, Defcon has been known as the world's most exuberant party for hackers and hacker hopefuls who gather in sin city for a rollicking good time. Conference organizers call it the "annual computer underground party for hackers," and Defcon . . . . For nine years, Defcon has been known as the world's most exuberant party for hackers and hacker hopefuls who gather in sin city for a rollicking good time. Conference organizers call it the "annual computer underground party for hackers," and Defcon is known as much for its technical content as its beer-tinged hijinks. Pranks such as smoke bombs in hotel pools, portions of telephone trucks mysteriously appearing in the convention hall and concrete dumped in toilets have earned Defcon a reputation as a kind of annual hacker bacchanalia. Until now. With little fanfare, Defcon has gradually gone corporate. The link for this article located at Wired is no longer available. . Defcon transitions from a vibrant gathering of hackers to a sphere of corporate impact, preserving its distinctive vibe.. Defcon Conference, Hacking Culture, Cybersecurity Event, Hacker Gathering. . Anthony Pell
In the name of convenience and safety, big business and big government keep pushing the boundaries of privacy and surveillance. Consider the latest from online retailer Amazon.com Inc. and the Super Bowl. Trusting businesses to protect privacy is always a risk, . . . . In the name of convenience and safety, big business and big government keep pushing the boundaries of privacy and surveillance. Consider the latest from online retailer Amazon.com Inc. and the Super Bowl. Trusting businesses to protect privacy is always a risk, because personal data is a valuable commodity. That's why I'm hesitant to take at face value a new Amazon service that looks quite useful -- and which, at least for now, is sensitive to privacy concerns, more so than many other e-commerce sites I can name. On Tuesday, the company announced the ``Honor System' -- a method for making payments to Web sites, either as voluntary contributions or payments for services or information. The Amazon service is similar in some respects to services such as PayPal (https://www.paypal.com/us/home), providing a way to make small payments conveniently. The link for this article located at MercuryCenter is no longer available. . In the name of convenience and safety, big business and big government keep pushing the boundaries o. convenience, safety, business, government, pushing, boundaries. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.