Network Security
system security Linux network
system security Linux network The romanticized image of the digital nomad – a laptop on a sun-drenched balcony – rarely accounts for the actual friction of maintaining a professional development environment on the move. . The friction is amplified with Linux. We are looking for a setup that respects our kernel configurations, handles volatile network handovers, and maintains a strict security posture without the hand-holding of a consumer-grade OS – so, put simply, more than just a laptop and a sunny deck. The hardware is...
May 26, 2026
Server Securityopen-source Linux administration
open-source Linux administration Cron has existed in Unix and Linux environments for decades, handling backups, cleanup scripts, patching jobs, log rotation, monitoring tasks, and other maintenance work that administrators do not want to run manually. Most Linux servers rely on it constantly, which is exactly why attackers continue abusing it for persistence after a system has already been compromised. . Persistence through cron is not complicated. Attackers do not need a rootkit or advanced malware framework to maintain...
May 25, 2026
Vendors/Productssecurity breach linux
security breach linux A major internal repository breach at GitHub has exposed a critical and overlooked blind spot in Linux supply chain security. Kernel exploits, exposed SSH services, weak firewall rules, and vulnerable daemons dominated the Linux threat model for years, and in many environments, they still matter. But recent supply-chain incidents involving GitHub ecosystems, npm packages, and malicious developer tooling point somewhere else entirely: the developer workstation. . The breach matters because...
May 21, 2026
Security Trends access control multi-tenant
access control multi-tenant Linux administrators often face an ugly choice in the cloud: prioritize convenience and cost-efficiency by sharing infrastructure, or sacrifice those benefits for the sake of total isolation. Most modern Linux workloads don't live on their own private servers anymore. They live in shared environments like Kubernetes clusters, where multiple teams and services run side-by-side. It sounds efficient, and it usually is. . But cloud isolation isn't as ironclad as it looks on the diagram. If you...
May 21, 2026
Vendors/Productsincident response cloud security
incident response cloud security Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) has become one of the most sought-after security services in the enterprise market — and with good reason. It promises the holy grail: broad visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, email, and identity, combined with the 24/7 human expertise most organizations simply cannot build in-house. . However, the rapid growth of the market has produced a wide range of providers whose capabilities vary considerably beneath the surface. Choosing the...
May 19, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 6 articles for you...
82
cybercrimeprivacy lawcourt ruling3rd Circuit: Auernheimer Hacking Conviction Overturned by Appeals Court
A federal appeals court on Friday overturned the conviction of a prominent computer hacker whose imprisonment had highlighted a growing debate over whether the government is overreaching in its campaign against cybercrime.. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that the Justice Department improperly put Andrew Auernheimer on trial in New Jersey, even though his alleged hacking took place elsewhere. The link for this article located at Washington Post is no longer available. . The appellate court ruled that the proceedings against Andrew Auernheimer were improperly managed by the Justice Department.. Computer Hacking, Cybercrime Legal Issues, Appeals Court Ruling. . Dave Wreski
Apr 14, 2014
•
Government
82
privacy issueNSAcourt rulingFederal Court Upholds NSA's Secret Relationship With Google
A federal appeals court on Friday upheld the National Security Agency. That The link for this article located at Wired is no longer available. . Federal Appeals Court affirms NSA's secret relationship with Google, impacting privacy and surveillance laws.. NSASurveillance, GooglePrivacy, LegalPrecedent. . Dave Wreski
May 14, 2012
•
Government
81
bloggingdefamationcourt rulingDelaware Supreme Court Ruling: Favoring Anonymous Blogger's Free Speech
In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official. . In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town councilman Patrick Cahill to make a stronger case that he and his wife, Julia, had been defamed before ordering Comcast Cable Communications to disclose the identities of four anonymous posters to a blog site operated by Independent Newspapers Inc., publisher of the Delaware State News. In a series of obscenity-laced tirades, the bloggers, among other things, pointed to Cahill's "obvious mental deterioration," and made several sexual references about him and his wife, including using the name "Gahill" to suggest that Cahill, who has publicly feuded with Smyrna Mayor Mark Schaeffer, is homosexual. In June, the lower court judge ruled that the Cahills had established a "good faith basis" for contending that they were victims of defamation and affirmed a previous order for Comcast to disclose the bloggers' identities. One of the bloggers, referred to in court papers only as John Doe No. 1 and his blog name, "Proud Citizen," challenged the ruling, arguing that the Cahills should have been required to establish a prima facie case of defamation before seeking disclosure of the defendants' identities. The link for this article located at Slashdot is no longer available. . In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town coun. decision, hailed, free-speech, advocates, delaware, supreme, court, wednesday, reversed. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Oct 07, 2005
•
Privacy
81
legal precedentemail marketingspam regulationCalifornia $2 Million Fine for Historic Spam Email Marketing Case
In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sending millions of unsolicited junk e-mails. The case was brought against PW Marketing, a Los Angeles-based Internet advertising company owned by Paul Willis and . . . . In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sending millions of unsolicited junk e-mails. The case was brought against PW Marketing, a Los Angeles-based Internet advertising company owned by Paul Willis and Claudia Griffin. The court found the company liable for sending a large quantity of spam that sold a $39 "how to" book for spammers and provided extensive lists of e-mail addresses. California expects the ruling to set a precedent for further aggressive antispam legal action. But regardless of this high-profile case, California's legal efforts "ultimately will not change the volume of spam," says Yankee Group analyst J. P. Gownder. . In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sendi. historic, first, california, court, fined, internet, marketing, company, million, sendi. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Oct 28, 2003
•
Privacy
67
legal precedentsoftware publicationBernstein caseImpact of Bernstein Cryptography Case Dismissal on Software Rights
This inconclusive ending of the Bernstein case is a consequence of the government's policy in cases where there are first amendment challenges to restrictions on the publication of software to claim that they have no intention of enforcing the law as . . . . This inconclusive ending of the Bernstein case is a consequence of the government's policy in cases where there are first amendment challenges to restrictions on the publication of software to claim that they have no intention of enforcing the law as it is written and thus getting the cases dismissed as moot. The end result is that, though Bernstein had originally won in both the District Court and the 9th Circuit and I lost my later-filed case involving much the same issues---Junger v. Daley---in the federal District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, it is the 6th Circuit Court of Appeal's decision reversing the District Court's decision in Junger v. Daley that is the leading case holding that computer programs are speech that is protected by the First Amendment. In the Bernstein case, when the government amended the regulations forbidding the publication of computer programs, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals withdrew its earlier opinion in Bernstein's favor and remanded the case to the district court, where the government claimed that they would not enforce the restrictions on cryptography against Dan Bernstein. In my case, on the other hand, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court's holding that the First Amendment does protect those who would publish software and then remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. At that point, rather than risking our victory in the 6th Circuit, we settled my case, even though the new regulations were---and are---constitutionally questionable. Although my case is now the leading case holding that publishing software is protected by the First Amendment, I do not believe that we would have had our success without the efforts of Dan Bernstein and his lawyers from theElectronic Freedom Foundation. The link for this article located at IP is no longer available. . The Morgan case remains open-ended, raising concerns about federal regulations on digital content distribution and free speech matters.. Bernstein Case,Cryptography Policy,First Amendment Rights,Software Publishing,Legal Precedent. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Oct 17, 2003
•
Cryptography
81
data collectionelectronic communicationslegal precedentFederal Appeals Court Allows Users To Sue Over Data Collection Violation
In a ruling that marks a victory for privacy proponents, a federal appeals panel is allowing a group of Web surfers to sue a company that gathered certain data about them without their consent. . .. In a ruling that marks a victory for privacy proponents, a federal appeals panel is allowing a group of Web surfers to sue a company that gathered certain data about them without their consent . The decision, handed down Friday by the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, clears the way for some pharmaceutical Web site users to pursue a class-action case against the operators of Boston-based Pharmatrak. The lawsuit alleges that the now-defunct Web traffic analysis company violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) by intercepting communications without permission. The ruling is significant, because the appeals panel attempted to address some muddy legal issues related to online data collection. These questions include what, in the online world, constitutes protected "content" for the purposes of intercepting communications--a technique commonly used by law enforcement agencies. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . A national court division permits internet users to file lawsuits regarding unapproved data gathering, a success for privacy defenders.. Data Collection Lawsuit, Online Privacy, Consent Laws. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
May 13, 2003
•
Privacy
81
court rulinglegal precedentspam regulationEighth Circuit Court Ruling Validates Junk Fax Restrictions on Spam
Attempts to reduce unsolicited emails may be helped by a federal court ruling that junk faxes can be restricted by law. A federal appeals court said on Friday that a law restricting junk faxes was constitutional, setting a precedent that favours legal attempts to restrict unsolicited email. . . .. Attempts to reduce unsolicited emails may be helped by a federal court ruling that junk faxes can be restricted by law. A federal appeals court said on Friday that a law restricting junk faxes was constitutional, setting a precedent that favours legal attempts to restrict unsolicited email. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's ruling, concluding that a 1991 federal law banning unsolicited fax advertising did not violate the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression. Congress' goal of "restricting unsolicited fax advertisements in order to prevent the cost shifting and interference such unwanted advertising places on the recipient" was reasonable, a three-judge panel ruled. The link for this article located at zdnet is no longer available. . The recent federal court decision regarding unsolicited faxes could pave the way for more stringent regulations on unwanted email communications.. Spam Regulation, Email Restrictions, Legal Precedent. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Mar 24, 2003
•
Privacy
83
legal precedentprosecutionhacker toolkitUK Cyber-Crime Laws Target Hacker Tool Authors: The TOrnkit Case
Cyber-crime laws and cops are now targeting those who write and distribute hacker toolkits. Currently, the case helping to establish a precedent on how authors of virus toolkits will be prosecuted in the UK is the case involving the author of . . . . Cyber-crime laws and cops are now targeting those who write and distribute hacker toolkits. Currently, the case helping to establish a precedent on how authors of virus toolkits will be prosecuted in the UK is the case involving the author of "TOrnkit", a suite of programs designed to enable hackers to hide their presence on cracked Linux computers. The law being used to prosecute the 21-year-old author of this toolkit, who Scotland Yard nabbed last week in a London suburb, is the 1990 Computer Misuse Act. How this law is interpreted with regard to "TOrnkit" will go a long way in setting the playing field for the prosecution of other authors of "hacker-helper" code. Dave Dittrich, University of Washington's senior security engineer commented. "Most of the versions (of TOrnkit and other hacker toolkit software) are circulated in the (hacker) underground, and they're tightly held." The link for this article located at VirusList.com is no longer available. . Cyber-crime laws and cops are now targeting those who write and distribute hacker toolkits. Currentl. cyber-crime, targeting, those, write, distribute, hacker, toolkits, currentl. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Oct 31, 2002
•
Hacks/Cracks
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!
Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More