In a lab in Chantilly, Va., Intel Corp. engineers are testing compatibility and interoperability of wireless networking products to help integrators and agencies cut through the confusion surrounding Wi-Fi adoption. . . .. In a lab in Chantilly, Va., Intel Corp. engineers are testing compatibility and interoperability of wireless networking products to help integrators and agencies cut through the confusion surrounding Wi-Fi adoption. The Santa Clara, Calif., company's Secure WLAN Infrastructure for Government initiative is in direct response to requests from the government IT market, Intel officials told Washington Technology. The link for this article located at Brad Grimes is no longer available. . Intel's development team is examining the interoperability of wireless devices to facilitate the integration of Wi-Fi technology within federal organizations.. Wireless Networking, Secure WLAN, Government IT, Compatibility Testing, IT Solutions. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Take that wireless hot spot in the local java joint, jack it up on steroids and use it to connect an entire city full of computers. That, in short, is WiMax, a cutting-edge wireless technology that's starting to prove its worth as a fast, cheap and easy networking option for businesses. . . .. Take that wireless hot spot in the local java joint, jack it up on steroids and use it to connect an entire city full of computers. That, in short, is WiMax, a cutting-edge wireless technology that's starting to prove its worth as a fast, cheap and easy networking option for businesses. Media consulting firm VMS has already used an early version of the technology to save money and improve efficiency. It started when VMS acquired a new company across town from its Manhattan headquarters, and CIO Gerry Louw had to find a way to connect the two offices with a secure network link. The link for this article located at David M. Ewalt is no longer available. . Take that wireless hot spot in the local java joint, jack it up on steroids and use it to connect an. wireless, local, joint, steroids, connect. . Anthony Pell
If you're interested in setting up a wireless network at your company, this guide will walk you through the steps needed to evaluate the role wireless networking technologies might play in your company's overall networking solution, and help you understand the steps you need to take to implement the solution. . . .. Wireless networks are becoming faster, more affordable and easier to adopt than ever. Growing small businesses that have adopted a wireless solution are already reporting immediate paybacks in higher productivity, flexible application mobility and greater worker satisfaction. Roughly 228,000 small businesses currently have remote access capabilities built into their networks for security monitoring, and according to America Marketing Institute, the number will double over the next 12 months. If you're interested in setting up a wireless network at your company, this guide will walk you through the steps needed to evaluate the role wireless networking technologies might play in your company's overall networking solution, and help you understand the steps you need to take to implement the solution. The link for this article located at Entrapreneur.com is no longer available. . Creating a strong wireless network in your organization boosts productivity and employee mobility. Follow this structured guide to achieve optimal results. Wireless Networking, Network Implementation, Business Technology. . Anthony Pell
"I opened up my wireless home network to the world, and I've never felt more comfortable." Thus starts a startlingly different perspective on privacy and security. . . .. Last week, I turned off all the security features of my wireless router. I removed WEP encryption, disabled MAC address filtering and made sure the SSID was being broadcast loud and clear. Now, anyone with a wireless card and a sniffer who happens by can use my connection to access the Internet. And with DHCP logging turned off, there's really no way to know who's using it. What's wrong with me? Haven't I heard about how malicious wardrivers can use my connection from across the street to stage their hacking operations? How my neighbors can steal my bandwidth so they don't have to pay for their own? How I'm exposing my home network to attacks from the inside? Yup. So why am I doing this? In a word, privacy. By making my Internet connection available to any and all who happen upon it, I have no way to be certain what kinds of songs, movies and pictures will be downloaded by other people using my IP address. And more important, my ISP has no way to be certain if it's me. In mid-April, Comcast sent letters to some of its subscribers claiming that their IP addresses had been used to download copyrighted movies. Since Comcast is not likely to improve customer satisfaction and retention with this strategy, it's probable the letter was a result of pressure from the Motion Picture Association of America or one of its members. And to Comcast's credit, it stopped short of direct accusation; instead it gives users an out. Says the letter, "If you believe in good faith that the allegedly infringing works have been removed or blocked by mistake or misidentification, then you may send a counter notification to Comcast." That's good enough for me. I've already composed my reply in case I receive one of these letters someday. "Dear Comcast, I am so sorry. I had no idea that copyrighted works were being downloaded via my IP address; I have a wireless router athome and it's possible that someone may have been using my connection at the time. I will do my best to secure this notoriously vulnerable technology, but I can make no guarantee that hackers will not exploit my network in the future." The link for this article located at salon.com is no longer available. . Delving into the dangers of turning off home Wi-Fi protection and the journey toward achieving digital confidentiality.. Wireless Networking, Home Router Security, Online Privacy. . Anthony Pell
I recently strolled past federal buildings along Connecticut Avenue in Washington, carrying a beta-test model of a tablet PC equipped with an integrated IEEE 802.11b wireless PC Card. In no time, it auto-detected a wireless network. The tablet asked me if I wanted to connect. I declined, but as I kept walking, the tablet detected signals for three more wireless networks. . .. I recently strolled past federal buildings along Connecticut Avenue in Washington, carrying a beta-test model of a tablet PC equipped with an integrated IEEE 802.11b wireless PC Card. In no time, it auto-detected a wireless network. The tablet asked me if I wanted to connect. I declined, but as I kept walking, the tablet detected signals for three more wireless networks . (Apparently, the Secret Service is curious about these free-ranging signals, too, and has sent teams around Washington snooping for wireless networks that broadcast signals onto the street.) I did no probing, so I don't know whether the signals my tablet PC detected came from government, corporate or home networks. Nevertheless, they're out there, just waiting for someone to exploit them. If a wireless connection extends beyond a network's firewall, or if no firewall exists, any passerby with a wireless notebook PC can tap the network's resources. Even if the network is protected, the passerby might manage to get Internet access. Say, for example, that the wireless network assigns the intruder a numerical Internet address, as many wireless networks routinely do. That makes a great starting point for hacking. The numerical, or Internet protocol, address lets the intruder guess at the range of IP addresses, which could lead to probing and denial-of-service attacks. Furthermore, passersby who have modern operating systems such as Microsoft's Windows XP can learn the names of the network servers. The GCN Lab found this out during a recent review of XP Service Pack 1. We couldn't connect to the servers, but we could see them. More insidious is stealthy monitoringof wireless networks from outside a building. Even if the network requires its users to have specific Media Access Control addresses in their hardware, a hacker can pretty easily sniff out such information from a bus stop or park nearby because MAC addresses are transmitted in plain text. By faking a sender's address, a hacker could break in as surely as if sitting at a desk inside the building. There are two main dangers to unsecured wireless networking. The first is that an intruder could use information from the wireless connection to steal data or launch an attack on the computing infrastructure. The second is that an intruder could use the connection for free Internet access. Hackers, and presumably terrorists, know that anonymous e-mail from services such as Hotmail and Yahoo can be traced backward. That's because information about an organization's IP address, operating system and files travels along with the e-mail headers. Say a terrorist stands outside your office's headquarters and e-mails threats over your wireless network. The digital trail will lead back to your office. And if the terrorist stole a notebook PC to do the deed and gets rid of it afterward, the unsuspecting network administrator will be the one left holding the bag. To add to the threat, more and more people support the "free Internet" movement in their neighborhoods. Some are "war-chalking," making chalk marks on buildings to signal others what sort of free wireless access can be tapped there, similar to the hobo symbols of old. I didn't happen to notice any chalk marks as I walked down Connecticut Avenue, but with wireless signals on the street silently screaming for clients, it's only a matter of time. The link for this article located at SecurityFocus is no longer available. . I recently strolled past federal buildings along Connecticut Avenue in Washington, carrying a beta-t. recently, strolled, federal, buildings, along, connecticut, avenue, washington, carrying, beta-t. . Anthony Pell
"We never gave security a thought," Brian Chee says, talking about what was probably the world's first wireless data network. Chee worked on Aloha Net, a new concept in communications developed by the University of Hawaii back in the late 60's. . . . . "We never gave security a thought," Brian Chee says, talking about what was probably the world's first wireless data network. Chee worked on Aloha Net, a new concept in communications developed by the University of Hawaii back in the late 60's. This network, using a form of magic called "carrier sense multiple access," let the university link computers on each of the state's islands. Later, the technology would migrate to the wired world, and with some improvements, would be known by the name "Ethernet." The data carried by Aloha Net eventually went to undersea cables and microwaves, Chee went on to run the university's prestigious Advanced Network Computing Laboratory, and wireless networking went on to ignore security. In fact, wireless networking ignored security for so long that most people think it still doesn't have any. In many cases, they're right. But it doesn't need to be that way. Now that wireless communications is becoming a critical technology for the enterprise, it can't be that way. The problem is that the disconnect between the IT staff's memories of wireless networking and today's reality is sufficiently large--a factor that keeps the technology from growing as fast as it should. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . 'We never gave security a thought,' Brian Chee says, talking about what was probably the world's fir. never, security, thought, brian, talking, about, probably, world's. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.