Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 492
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 492

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -4 articles for you...
74

Mitigating Blaster Worm Threat: Network Security Strategies

Last month, some cretin Out There writes Yet Another Worm called Blaster that can infect whole networks at once. That is, it can infect whole networks of Windows computers whose administrators haven't upgraded their operating system to incorporate the latest security . . . . Last month, some cretin Out There writes Yet Another Worm called Blaster that can infect whole networks at once. That is, it can infect whole networks of Windows computers whose administrators haven't upgraded their operating system to incorporate the latest security patches from Microsoft. One of the side features of these infections was a planned denial of service attack that was supposed to be launched against Microsoft's WindowsUpdate servers Saturday, Aug. 16. Like other worms, Blaster propagates via several Internet-based programs. To alert the user community, various authorities issued dire warnings about how to block the culprit and contain its damage. One of these warnings came from our federal Department of Homeland Security, which issued its alert at the end of July. Several broadband network administrators took it upon themselves to cut off inbound access to the three ports recommended by the feds, specifically ports 135, 139, and 445. This broke several other legitimate applications (including Outlook/Exchange transactions that occur over the public Internet). Several people complained when they were told the only way to connect to their Exchange servers was to install a VPN, use Outlook Web Access, or upgrade to Exchange 2003 (which isn't yet available). Exchange actually uses a bunch of different ports besides 135, for those of you interested. The link for this article located at SecurityPipeline is no longer available. . Last month, some cretin Out There writes Yet Another Worm called Blaster that can infect whole netwo. month, cretin, there, writes, another, called, blaster, infect, whole, netwo. . Anthony Pell

Calendar%202 Aug 27, 2003 User Avatar Anthony Pell Network Security
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200