EnGarde Secure Linux v3.0.5 Now Available

    Date10 Mar 2006
    14563
    Posted ByBrittany Day
    Guardian Digital is happy to announce the release of EnGarde Secure Community 3.0.5 (Version 3.0, Release 5). This release includes several bug fixes and feature enhancements to the Guardian Digital WebTool and the SELinux policy, several updated packages, and a couple of new packages available for installation.

    The following reported bugs from bugs.engardelinux.org are fixed in this release:

        #0000061 Problem creating virtual interface via webtool.
        #0000059 Problem creating SSL certificates
        #0000056 When clicking ALL in Access Control - access is blocked.
        #0000055 SSH Key Passphrase issue
        #0000054 IMPROVED GDSN Package Management Interface
        #0000053 We can support EM64T
        #0000052 LILO cannot send output to the terminal
    
    Several other bugs are fixed in this release as well.

    New features include:

    • Support for the 64bit Intel EM64T architecture. Users with these machines can now use the x86_64 ISO image in full 64bit mode.
    • The latest stable versions of aide (0.11), gnupg (1.4.2.2), postfix (2.2.9), samba (3.0.21c), and xinetd (2.3.14), and zaptel (1.2.4)
    • New packages for bridge-utils (1.1) and perl-Net-SNMP (5.2.0).

    All new users downloading EnGarde Secure Linux for the first time or users who use the LiveCD environment should download this release.

    Users who are currently using EnGarde Secure Linux do not need to download this release -- they can update their machines via the Guardian Digital Secure Network WebTool module.

    Downloading

    Below are the MD5 sums for the i686 and x86_64 ISO images:

        48c576b482ef33c50d11307147af59c6  engarde-community-3.0.5.i686.iso
        09f24395321845857d8ac459c3e28dd9  engarde-community-3.0.5.x86_64.iso
    
    You may download this ISO image by following the "Download Now!" link from engardelinux.org:

    http://www.engardelinux.org/

    (It may take several days for this image to make it to our mirrors, please be patient).

    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"82","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.16,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.07,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.