Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 420
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 420

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":4,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -4 articles for you...
81

California Court Protects Anonymous Speech Rights: EFF Celebrates Ruling

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is praising a California court decision that protects the right to post to the Internet anonymously. The case pitted free-speech advocates, such as the foundation, against companies and others unhappy with anonymous notes that are critical of . . . . The Electronic Frontier Foundation is praising a California court decision that protects the right to post to the Internet anonymously. The case pitted free-speech advocates, such as the foundation, against companies and others unhappy with anonymous notes that are critical of corporate actions. Judge Neil Cabrinha of the Santa Clara County Superior Court denied a subpoena request by Pre-Paid Legal Services Inc. seeking the identities of eight people who had criticized Pre-Paid on a message board. Pre-Paid execs could not be reached for comment. It's not known if they'll appeal. Cabrinha denied Pre-Paid's request on First Amendment grounds. Lawyers for the company had said Pre-Paid needed to know if the eight individuals were former Pre-Paid sales staff who had voluntarily agreed not to reveal sales secrets. The foundation defended two of the eight, arguing that their postings were merely critical of Pre-Paid and its treatment of salespeople. Requiring them to reveal their identities would let the company punish the two for speaking out and discourage others from criticizing via the Internet, foundation attorneys argued. The link for this article located at Information Week is no longer available. . The Digital Rights Group applauds a recent ruling by a California court that upholds the right to anonymous speech on the internet.. California Court, Anonymous Posting, Free Expression, Privacy Rights. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 15, 2001 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":4,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200