Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 514
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 514

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -1 articles for you...
210

Bind: High Severity Advisory for DoS Attacks - CVE-2023-2828, CVE-2023-2911

Several remotely exploitable security issues were found in the Bind Internet Domain Name Server. It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled the cache size limit (CVE-2023-2828) and the recursive-clients quota (CVE-2023-2911). With a low attack complexity and a high availability impact, these bugs have received a National Vulnerability Database severity rating of “High”. . A remote attacker could possibly use these issues to consume memory or to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). An important Bind security update that fixes these DoS bugs has been released. We strongly recommend that all impacted users apply the Bind updates issued by their distro(s) now to prevent downtime due to an attack. To stay on top of important updates released by the open-source programs and applications you use, be sure to register as a LinuxSecurity user , then subscribe to our Linux Advisory Watch newsletter and customize your advisories for the distro(s) you use. This will enable you to stay up-to-date on the latest, most significant issues impacting the security of your systems. Follow @LS_Advisories on Twitter for real-time updates on advisories for your distro(s) . . Online assailants may take advantage of vulnerabilities in Bind software leading to system failures or service interruptions. Install the latest security patches to address these threats.. Remote Exploit, Bind DNS, DoS Attacks, Security Issues, High Severity. . Brittany Day

Calendar%202 Jul 06, 2023 User Avatar Brittany Day Security Vulnerabilities
67

Implementing TSIG in BIND 9: Secure DNS Communication Mechanisms

Vivek Gite submitted a nice article on implementing TSIG in BIND: Transaction signatures (TSIG) is a mechanism used to secure DNS messages and to provide secure server-to-server communication. This includes zone transfer, notify, and recursive query messages. TSIG uses shared secrets and a one-way hash function to authenticate DNS messages, particularly responses and updates.This tutorial discusses the security mechanisms implemented in BIND v8.2+ / v9.x to secure DNS messages and name servers Click-through to read more!. The link for this article located at cyberciti.biz is no longer available. . Explore the integration of TSIG to boost DNS security using BIND, guaranteeing secure interactions between servers.. BIND9 TSIG Implementation, DNS Security, Secure DNS Transactions. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jan 27, 2009 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Cryptography
77

DNS Security: Threats and Protection Strategies Overview

The Internet is a seemingly limitless source of information. It provides the power of collective knowledge and information to a vast array of users who access innumerable resources for countless reasons. These resources are typically accessed by using a human readable name designed to be easily remembered, thus increasing the usability of the resource. These human readable names, as the very term implies, are for the sake of the human users. Network devices, however, find each other by using a number, referred to as IP (Internet Protocol) addresses. The Domain Name System is the service that maps the human readable names to device specific IP addresses creating the user friendly nature of networked systems. . The Internet and millions of other networks are dependent upon the functionality of the Domain Name System. DNS is a complex, hierarchical system of distributed databases which are dependent upon each other to respond to queries by network users. The failure of this system at any level has crippling effects on network access. An infiltration of the DNS system can lead to disastrous consequences by directing unsuspecting users to network locations that are designed to steal their valuable information. Given the interconnected nature of economic, military and political communications, protecting this DNS structure from threats has taken on a new level of significance. BIND is the standard DNS server used on Linux and Unix systems. This document will first present an overview of the DNS architecture and name resolution process as well as describe common threats to DNS. Finally this document will outline some of the defensive configurations that can be implemented in BIND to help protect against some of these common threats. The link for this article located at Info Sec Writers is no longer available. . In today's dynamic cybersecurity environment, protecting DNS is essential. Explore key methods to strengthen DNS security and defend against threats.. Dns Security, Network Protection, Domain NameSystem, Threat Mitigation, Bind Configuration. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 01, 2006 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
77

Enhancing DNS Security in BIND 9 with TSIG for Better Protection

Like most Internet protocols, the Domain Name System (DNS) began its life without many built-in security mechanisms. DNS is, after all, a global, public naming service, so you don't normally care who queries your name server for data in the zones that you are responsible for maintaining.. . .. Like most Internet protocols, the Domain Name System (DNS) began its life without many built-in security mechanisms. DNS is, after all, a global, public naming service, so you don't normally care who queries your name server for data in the zones that you are responsible for maintaining. The Unix world (including Linux) generally used BIND, the Berkeley Internet Name Domain software, to handle the resolution of domain names to IP addresses (and vice versa). Microsoft has its own implementation of a domain name server, first included in Windows NT 4.0 and now shipped in Windows 2000. While neither BIND nor the Microsoft DNS Server were particularly secure, BIND was open source and evolved quickly to include new security mechanisms for countering the malicious attacks that became more prevalent when DNS's vulnerabilities were realized. One of those security mechanisms, first introduced in BIND 8.2, was TSIG (Transaction Signatures). Later, Microsoft released Windows 2000, which uses a dialect of TSIG to secure dynamic updates between Windows 2000 clients and name servers. (Unfortunately, this isn't a dialect spoken by BIND yet, and it's not clear which version will support it. For more information on running BIND in a mixed environment, see the article "The Ties That BIND" () in the March 2001 issue of Linux Magazine.) BIND 9 supports TSIG even more completely, allowing administrators to secure almost any communication between two name servers. The techniques in this article counter a variety of attacks that could render a DNS server unable to do its job. Be sure to read our interview with Paul Vixie and David Conrad on BINDv9 and Internet Security. The link for this article located atLinux Magazine is no longer available. . Explore how TSIG enhances DNS security in BIND 9, countering attacks and securing name server communications effectively.. DNS Security, BIND 9, TSIG, Cybersecurity Techniques, Internet Protocols. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 19, 2002 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200