Two Democratic senators want to temporarily pause the government’s use of facial recognition technology while a commission develops regulations. . A pair of Democratic senators have introduced legislation to temporarily pause the federal government’s use and purchase of facial recognition technology until Congress passes regulations. Sens. Cory Booker (N.J.) and Jeff Merkley (Ore.) announced the move on Wednesday , reflecting a growing movement to regulate and even ban the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement, government agencies like Customs and Border Protection and private corporations. The link for this article located at Security Today is no longer available. . Two Democratic congressional members advocate for a freeze on the federal implementation of facial recognition technology until appropriate regulations are established.. Federal Facial Recognition Regulation, Biometric Privacy Laws, Senate Bill Facial Recognition. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
The European Union is debating a potential ban on the use of facial recognition technologies in public areas which could last for five years, allowing lawmakers to catch up. . Facial recognition-equipped systems, such as those found in mobile devices and cameras, are advocated by law enforcement as a way to track missing persons and as useful tools in criminal investigations. However, critics say this technology is susceptible to abuse and its use without the consent of the general public undermines our right to privacy. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . The EU is considering a possible prohibition on facial recognition technology in public areas to safeguard privacy rights and tackle ethical dilemmas.. Facial Recognition Regulation, EU Privacy Laws, Biometric Ethics, Public Surveillance, Law Enforcement Technology. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
UK companies are anticipating the introduction of biometric technology to increase workplace security, according to a new independent survey commissioned as part of the Hitachi Data Systems Storage Index. The survey finds that 65 per cent of firms expect to see iris scanning and fingerprint recognition systems in the office, with 44 per cent expecting to see them introduced within two years. . . .. UK companies are anticipating the introduction of biometric technology to increase workplace security, according to a new independent survey commissioned as part of the Hitachi Data Systems Storage Index. The survey finds that 65 per cent of firms expect to see iris scanning and fingerprint recognition systems in the office, with 44 per cent expecting to see them introduced within two years. The survey comes amid growing adoption of biometric technology by border control and public sector organisations and reveals that over half of companies (54 per cent) believe that the use of biometrics in office buildings is a justified security measure, although the same number anticipate some staff or customer resistance to the technology. Few respondents (28 per cent) thought that `Big Brother' style abuse of biometric information was likely - either by companies or government agencies. "It seems that attitudes towards biometrics are rapidly improving as the technology becomes more common and people recognise the growing security benefits," says Tony Reid, Director of Storage Solutions, Hitachi Data Systems EMEA. "Of course, companies will still need to comply with various privacy and data protection regulations that govern how long personal information can be stored and what it can be used for - which presents a further IT challenge for many." The link for this article located at itrportal.com is no longer available. . Businesses in the UK are preparing to implement biometric solutions aimed at bolstering security protocols and fostering a culture of safety among employees.. Biometric Technology, Workplace Security,Fingerprint Systems. . Anthony Pell
A growing number of people will carry their identifying data on microchips in passports, employment ID cards or drivers' licenses in 2004, analysts say. But the data is useless unless the technologies and public records are integrated, a job that has become a fast-growing business for data processing giants like I.B.M., Unisys and Siemens. "The technology is advancing rapidly," said Ed Schaffner, director of positive ID and access control solutions at Unisys, who said that the first government agencies to adopt the technology would put their systems in place in 2004. "The big growth will be in 2005 and 2006," he said.. . .. A growing number of people will carry their identifying data on microchips in passports, employment ID cards or drivers' licenses in 2004, analysts say. But the data is useless unless the technologies and public records are integrated, a job that has become a fast-growing business for data processing giants like I.B.M., Unisys and Siemens. "The technology is advancing rapidly," said Ed Schaffner, director of positive ID and access control solutions at Unisys, who said that the first government agencies to adopt the technology would put their systems in place in 2004. "The big growth will be in 2005 and 2006," he said. The Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks ignited interest in more precise ways to identify people, particularly in the field of biometrics, which makes use of distinctive body features. Among the biometric techniques that have been explored are scanning eyes for individualized features of the retina or iris, using cameras and computers to map the distances between parts of the face, and studying the patterns of voice or gait. But as governments complete initial testing and begin putting into place new security systems at border crossings and at sites like airports and embassies, there is a clear winner among the competing biometric technologies: the old-fashioned fingerprint. "They are looking for proven technology that's stable and familiar," said Dr. Joseph J. Atick,president and chief executive of Identix, a leading supplier of biometric technology. "It's not about technology. It's about lowering your deployment risk." The link for this article located at NYTimes is no longer available. . A growing number of people will carry their identifying data on microchips in passports, employment . growing, number, people, carry, their, identifying, microchips, passports, employment. . Anthony Pell
The rage was post-9/11 when facial recognition vendors started promoting a media frenzy about the use of biometrics to inhibit terrorism. That promise has never been fulfilled...a lot of folks thought, 'Biometrics are a solution against terrorism.' From that false assumption, . . . . The rage was post-9/11 when facial recognition vendors started promoting a media frenzy about the use of biometrics to inhibit terrorism. That promise has never been fulfilled...a lot of folks thought, 'Biometrics are a solution against terrorism.' From that false assumption, we saw a lot of stock activity in biometrics-related companies, and a lot of media attention, and discussion about the potential uses of biometrics. Biometrics haven't changed in the last year. Nothing changed after September 11 to make biometrics more interesting or useful than they were before, except some excellent public relations and media. The uses of biometric technologies are still as limited and tactical as they have ever been. But biometric technologies extend far beyond facial recognition, whose primary use is picking faces out of a crowd or identifying faces against a database of recorded faces. There are other biometric technologies besides facial recognition that are interesting. Probably the most useful and flexible biometric technology is the fingerprint reader. It performs an accurate biometric scan. It can be encrypted; it can be protected. It can be built into a keyboard, a smart card reader, or an ATM machine. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . In the wake of September 11, biometric systems emerged as vital security solutions, enhancing identity verification but raising concerns over privacy and data protection. Biometric Technology, Facial Identification, Security Innovations, Tactical Applications. . Anthony Pell
Biometrics vendors are doing their best to supplant passwords as the chief form of computer security, but Government Computer News Lab tests indicate that many of their products are not quite ready. Some developers have continued to improve already good devices, . . . . Biometrics vendors are doing their best to supplant passwords as the chief form of computer security, but Government Computer News Lab tests indicate that many of their products are not quite ready. Some developers have continued to improve already good devices, but others need to go back to the drawing board. Bad biometric security is worse than no security at all because it can lock out a legitimate user, admit an interloper or -- perhaps most dangerous -- lull a network administrator into a false sense of safety. For this review we examined six fingerprint-recognition devices and one voice-recognition device. A word of caution: An administrator cannot deploy large numbers of any of those fingerprint devices without third-party administrative software. The link for this article located at WashingtonPost is no longer available. . Leading biometrics companies strive to eliminate traditional passwords, but numerous solutions still fall short based on recent evaluations.. Biometric Security, Authentication Devices, Fingerprint Recognition Techniques. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
In this rural outpost about a four-hour drive from the nation's capital, the Defense Department has set up its first biometrics testing laboratory to scientifically scrutinize hundreds of commercial products that scan unique physical traits -- such as eye, finger or . . . . In this rural outpost about a four-hour drive from the nation's capital, the Defense Department has set up its first biometrics testing laboratory to scientifically scrutinize hundreds of commercial products that scan unique physical traits -- such as eye, finger or voice -- to prove a person's identity. The goal at the Biometrics Fusion Center, as the Defense Department calls it, is to determine if any of the nearly 600 products on the market are good enough for widespread -- and possibly mandatory -- use by Defense Department personnel to gain access to computer networks in the future. If the department puts its weight behind biometrics, it could push body-based authentication technology from the exotic to the mainstream. But analysts following biometrics say that while products are improving, shortcomings remain. In general, the products are expensive and raise privacy fears. Biometrics offerings, particularly those for fingerprint scans, can also have high error rates, mistakenly rejecting someone based on his fingerprint. The link for this article located at CNN is no longer available. . The Pentagon investigates innovative biometric systems to improve safety and entry management utilizing distinct physiological characteristics.. Biometric Technology, Access Control, Fingerprint Recognition, Security Testing, Defense Innovations. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.