Leading into 2015, the cybersecurity community was still reeling from the impact of a destructive attack unlike any other we have seen in terms of visibility, scale, and impact. Already halfway into 2015, there is no shortage of breaches. We have already witnessed major compromises in healthcare, the US government, the Bundestag, and media being attacked by sophisticated adversaries, in most cases, roaming freely on networks for months at a time.. Attackers from China, Russia, North Korea, ISIS, and even potentially friendly governments have dominated the headlines. In case you have your head in the sand, this is not going away anytime soon. Compared to traditional espionage, "cyber espionage," or CNE as the military likes to designate it, has a lower cost of entry, less risk if you are caught or compromised, and can often yield equivalent intelligence to feed an ever-growing set of interested consumers. The link for this article located at Dark Reading is no longer available. . Cyber espionage, driven by nations like China, merges political, economic, and strategic motives, seeking sensitive data and trade secrets for national security and economic dominance. Cyber Espionage, Data Breach, Network Security, Threat Analysis, Sensitive Data Risks. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Every year or so, a crisis or three exposes deep fractures in the system that's supposed to serve as the internet's foundation of trust. In 2008, it was the devastating weakness in SSL, or secure sockets layer, certificates issued by a subsidiary of VeriSign. . The following year, it was the minting of a PayPal credential that continued to fool Internet Explorer, Chrome and Safari browsers more than two months after the underlying weakness was exposed. And in 2010, it was the mystery of a root certificate included in Mac OS X and Mozilla software that went unsolved for four days until RSA Security finally acknowledged it fathered the orphan credential. This year, it was last month's revelation that unknown hackers broke into the servers of a reseller of Comodo, one of the world's most widely used certificate authorities, and forged documents for Google Mail and other sensitive websites. It took two, seven and eight days for the counterfeits to be blacklisted by Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and IE respectively, meaning users of those browsers were vulnerable to unauthorized monitoring of some of their most intimate web conversations during that time. The link for this article located at The Register UK is no longer available. . Examine the fundamental SSL pitfalls that jeopardize online confidence and protection, revealing shocking incidents and their repercussions.. SSL Certificate Issues, Web Trust Problems, Certificate Authority Breaches, Security Flaws. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
It. About 34 mostly undisclosed companies were breached. Now a leading computer forensic firm is providing the closest look so far at the nature of the attacks, and attackers, that struck Google and others. The report never mentions Google by name, or any other companies, but focuses on information gathered from hundreds of forensic investigations the firm has conducted that are identical to what we know about the Google hack. What the information indicates is that the attack that hit Google is identical to publicly undisclosed attacks that have quietly plagued thousands of other U.S. companies and government agencies since 2002 and are rapidly growing. They represent a sea change from the kinds of attacks that have commonly hit networks and made headlines. The link for this article located at Wired is no longer available. . Uncover insights regarding breaches affecting various enterprises, highlighting a transformation in tactics impacting a multitude of firms.. cybersecurity, breach analysis, incident management, forensic investigation, threat landscape. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.